Laserfiche WebLink
Comment—The EAW references periodic washing of gravel associated with the project, <br /> but does not identify the source of the wash water or the treatment and disposal of <br /> wastewater. <br /> Response—Washing of gravel has been eliminated from the project since the EAW was <br /> prepared, therefore these comments are no longer relevant. <br /> Comment—Former Judicial Ditch#1 is referenced in the EAW, but its location is not <br /> delineated. <br /> Response—Although Judicial Ditch# 1 has been formerly abandoned, it will be used as <br /> an outlet for run-off from the site. Abandoned Judicial Ditch#1's branches ultimately <br /> discharge to the Trott Brook. Because the elevations of the inlet and outlet of the ditch <br /> on the subject property will remain unchanged, post-restoration run-off rates are <br /> anticipated to be similar to predevelopment run-off rates. The outlet will be protected <br /> from erosion with rip rap, silt fence and a vegetative buffer to remove nutrients. To <br /> ensure consistency with the Wetland Conservation Act, the Technical Evaluation Panel <br /> for the City of Elk River has looked at this issue in detail. <br /> Comment—Whether or not temporary or portable storage tanks will be used to store fuel. <br /> Response—There will be no temporary or portable storage tanks for the storage of fuels. <br /> The petitioner will be using refueling trucks at designated locations on the site for <br /> refueling vehicles. <br /> Comment - Would like to see the "Potential to Emit" calculations to see if the project has <br /> the potential to significantly impact air quality. <br /> Response—City Staff has informed the petitioner that "Potential to Emit" calculations are <br /> required for the project. If a MPCA Air Quality Permit is required, the city will copied. <br /> Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR)—letter from Kathleen Wallace, <br /> dated August 18, 2004. <br /> Comment— Waterfowl habitat and a fishing pond are problematic and shallower slopes <br /> will allow for better vegetation establishment, less erosion and better water quality. <br /> Response—All of the issues raised in this letter have been reviewed by the City of Elk <br /> River's Technical Evaluation Panel, which includes a DNR Fisheries Biologist. <br /> Adjustments to wetland mitigation plan for the project have been made in an attempt to <br /> address these concerns. <br /> Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT)— letter from Claudia Dumont, <br /> dated August 9, 2004. <br />