My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.3. PCSR 08-24-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2000-2005
>
2004
>
08-24-2004
>
5.3. PCSR 08-24-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2013 12:16:06 PM
Creation date
10/18/2013 12:11:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
8/24/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comment—The EAW references periodic washing of gravel associated with the project, <br /> but does not identify the source of the wash water or the treatment and disposal of <br /> wastewater. <br /> Response—Washing of gravel has been eliminated from the project since the EAW was <br /> prepared, therefore these comments are no longer relevant. <br /> Comment—Former Judicial Ditch#1 is referenced in the EAW, but its location is not <br /> delineated. <br /> Response—Although Judicial Ditch# 1 has been formerly abandoned, it will be used as <br /> an outlet for run-off from the site. Abandoned Judicial Ditch#1's branches ultimately <br /> discharge to the Trott Brook. Because the elevations of the inlet and outlet of the ditch <br /> on the subject property will remain unchanged, post-restoration run-off rates are <br /> anticipated to be similar to predevelopment run-off rates. The outlet will be protected <br /> from erosion with rip rap, silt fence and a vegetative buffer to remove nutrients. To <br /> ensure consistency with the Wetland Conservation Act, the Technical Evaluation Panel <br /> for the City of Elk River has looked at this issue in detail. <br /> Comment—Whether or not temporary or portable storage tanks will be used to store fuel. <br /> Response—There will be no temporary or portable storage tanks for the storage of fuels. <br /> The petitioner will be using refueling trucks at designated locations on the site for <br /> refueling vehicles. <br /> Comment - Would like to see the "Potential to Emit" calculations to see if the project has <br /> the potential to significantly impact air quality. <br /> Response—City Staff has informed the petitioner that "Potential to Emit" calculations are <br /> required for the project. If a MPCA Air Quality Permit is required, the city will copied. <br /> Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR)—letter from Kathleen Wallace, <br /> dated August 18, 2004. <br /> Comment— Waterfowl habitat and a fishing pond are problematic and shallower slopes <br /> will allow for better vegetation establishment, less erosion and better water quality. <br /> Response—All of the issues raised in this letter have been reviewed by the City of Elk <br /> River's Technical Evaluation Panel, which includes a DNR Fisheries Biologist. <br /> Adjustments to wetland mitigation plan for the project have been made in an attempt to <br /> address these concerns. <br /> Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT)— letter from Claudia Dumont, <br /> dated August 9, 2004. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.