Laserfiche WebLink
FW:Dereg in California <br /> Jim <br /> California Municipal Utilities Association Questions New Electric Market Experiment <br /> California Municipal Utilities Association <br /> Online Exclusive, Jul 7 2003 <br /> By vote of its state-appointed board last month, the California Independent System Operator Corporation <br /> (CAISO) has decided that California should risk reliving the electricity service disaster that plagued the <br /> state in 2000 and 2001. <br /> The CAISO was established in 1998 to provide open access to high voltage transmission systems. Last <br /> month the CAISO approved a new market structure that has two basic principles: (1) reliability services <br /> should be provided by market-based bids rather than assured through a cost-based regime; and (2) scarce <br /> transmission, akin to space on crowded interstate freeways, should be made available to the highest <br /> bidder. <br /> By its vote last Thursday, the CAISO Board essentially affirmed that the market experiment commenced <br /> by the state legislature with AB 1890 in 1996 was the right thing to do. We disagree," said Jerry Jordan, <br /> executive director of the states association of publicly owned electric utilities, the California Municipal <br /> Utilities Association. "California is once again breaking new ground and adopting a market structure that <br /> is not being adopted by anyone else in the Western United States. The 11 western states operate one <br /> interconnected electric system. California's adopting a market structure which ignores the practices in the <br /> rest of the West is a huge gamble. This is doubly true when applied to California's electricity grid, which <br /> is short of transmission and generation in key locations. The state-appointed CAISO Board is taking a big <br /> chance with California's energy future." <br /> The CAISO action came in its approval of Market Design 2002 (MD02). MD02 is based upon the <br /> Standard Market Design advocated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), but which has <br /> been rebuffed by several states. It is based on a system of financial derivative transmission rights that <br /> attempts to replicate the traditional system of assigning physical transmission capability to consumers. <br /> "The FERC and CAISO proposal is not a good idea at this time, because now California can not afford <br /> another energy market experiment, especially when state energy officials are predicting shortfalls right <br /> about the time MD02 would go into actual operation." Jordan said. <br /> Jim <br /> is you Ira e enough information to make a business case. you're too late " --Bill crate. <br /> Jim Walters, CEM <br /> Manager of Marketing and External Services <br /> Rochester Public Utilities <br /> 4000 East River Rd. N.E. <br /> Rochester, MN 55906-2813 <br /> 507-280-1606 <br /> f 3 7/11/03 8:31 AM <br /> • <br />