Laserfiche WebLink
include data-transmission-only services. Finally, with limited exceptions, these <br /> regulations do not apply to excavation and installation of new fiber connections to <br /> existing wireless facilities. <br /> New FCC Rulemaking <br /> The FCC has initiated a new proposed rulemaking related to zoning of wireless facilities. <br /> Comments from interested parties are due 60 days from date of publication in the Federal <br /> Register. However, it is unclear when the proposed rules will be published due to the <br /> federal shutdown. <br /> The proposed rules could impact Minnesota cities. First, the FCC proposes to make a <br /> non-binding "guidance" it issued in response to the Job Creation Act of 2012 into a <br /> binding regulation. In the guidance, the FCC stated that adding an antenna to a tower that <br /> increases the height by less than 10%, or by twenty feet, whichever is greater, is not a <br /> "substantial change" and thus must be approved. Similarly, the FCC concluded that an <br /> antenna that protrudes horizontally from the body of a tower by less than twenty feet, or <br /> the width of the tower at the level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater, is not <br /> substantial. The FCC proposes to adopt these conclusions as a binding rule. <br /> In response, the FCC recently issued a non-binding "guidance" concluding that adding an <br /> antenna to tower that increases the height by less than 10%, or by twenty feet, whichever <br /> is greater, is not a "substantial change." Similarly, the FCC concluded that the addition <br /> of an antenna that protrudes horizontally from the body of a tower by less than twenty <br /> feet, or the width of the tower at the level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater, is not <br /> substantial. <br /> In addition, the FCC is asking whether it should supplement its "shot clock" to deem an <br /> application automatically granted if the locality fails to satisfy the FCC's deadlines. It <br /> asks whether the shot clock runs from the time that an application is filed even if the <br /> community has adopted a moratorium on applications. And it asks whether a local <br /> government "unreasonably discriminates" when it requires a preference for siting on <br /> government property. Unlike the current "shot clock," these proposed actions could <br /> impact municipal zoning authority in Minnesota. <br /> Finally, current FCC rules governing the environmental and historic preservation review <br /> of wireless deployments focus on new, large-scale deployments on towers or other tall <br /> structures. The rules exempt the collocation of antennas on existing antenna towers and <br /> buildings from most environmental review. The proposed rules would expand the <br /> exemption to include existing structures such as utility poles, water tanks, light poles, and <br /> road signs. <br /> 432895v1 RJV SH255-I <br />