My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.1 HPSR 10-17-2013
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Heritage Preservation Commission
>
HPC Packets
>
2013
>
10-17-2013
>
5.1 HPSR 10-17-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2013 4:13:50 PM
Creation date
10/10/2013 4:13:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
HPSR
date
10/17/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(FRANKLIN) 320558.3000.800.221.4144•fax 320.558.3004 <br /> OUTDOOR ADVERTISING "Outdoor Advertising SELLS for you all day,every day" <br /> September 3,2013 <br /> To:Elk River City Council and Planning Commission <br /> RE: Sign ordinance. <br /> Greetings Councilors and Commissioners <br /> Recently,in addition to staff's review of the sign ordinance,the Government Relations Committee of <br /> the Elk River Chamber of Commerce reviewed the sign ordinance. I believe they have submitted their <br /> recommendation to city staff. This letter is in support of the recommended amendments submitted by <br /> the Elk River Chamber of Commerce. <br /> As a member of the committee reviewing the sign ordinance,there were two main areas of concern. <br /> The first was a need for increased business signage on walls and freestanding signs. The second was the <br /> lack of billboards along the hwy 169 corridor and limited ability for expansion. This letter will focus on <br /> the billboard issue. <br /> On August 30th I met with city staff to discuss their review of the sign ordinance. I shared with staff my <br /> concern and ideas about the regulations of billboards. <br /> Some of the performance standards for billboards are; 1200 `spacing between signs,400 square feet,25' <br /> height, allowed only in zoning districts Industrial 1,2 or C3 and located only along hwy 10 or 169. <br /> While these performance standards are considered restrictive to a billboard company,they are <br /> acceptable. However,in addition to the aforementioned standards is the"principle use"requirement, <br /> which requires a billboard to be on its own lot. I ask that you consider eliminating the principle use <br /> clause from the ordinance. Billboards do and can coexist within developed areas. As well billboards <br /> can coexist on larger parcels with another principle use(such as along hwy 169). As an alternative,to <br /> eliminating the principle use,you can add spacing requirements from all buildings and signage to help <br /> reduce the density <br /> Another concern I discussed is the lack of advertising along the Hwy 169 corridor,and the lack of <br /> opportunity for additional billboards. Therefore I ask that you consider allowing billboards in the CRT <br /> zoning district,with the elimination of the principle use. There is a lot of open space being staged for <br /> potential growth. I believe regulated billboards would fit well within the CRT zoning district and <br /> provide a tool for your businesses to promote growth. <br /> Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to further discussion <br /> , t <br /> Respectfully, <br /> Steven L. Anderson <br /> Lease Manager <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.