My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.5. SR 10-07-2013
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2013
>
10-07-2013
>
4.5. SR 10-07-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2013 12:25:37 PM
Creation date
10/4/2013 12:21:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
10/7/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Elk River, Minnesota <br /> Preliminary Financial Analysis of Blackhawk Woods TIF Application <br /> 10/03/2013 <br /> Page 3 <br /> the issuance of bonds or as an internal loan. Future tax increment would be collected by the City and used to pay <br /> debt service on the bonds or repayment of the internal loan. With pay-as-you-go financing, the developer would <br /> finance all project costs upfront and would be reimbursed over time for a portion of those costs as revenues are <br /> available. <br /> Pay-as-you-go-financing is generally more acceptable than upfront financing for the City because it shifts the risk for <br /> repayment to the developer. If tax increment revenues are less than originally projected, the developer receives less <br /> and therefore bears the risk of not being reimbursed the full amount of their financing. With bonds, the City would still <br /> need to make debt service payments and would have to use other sources to fill any shortfall of tax increment <br /> revenues. With internal financing, the City risks not repaying itself in full if tax increment revenues are not sufficient. <br /> Typically in either case of upfront financing, there is a shortfall payment guarantee with the developer. The developer <br /> has requested financial assistance as pay-as-you-go through a developer note. <br /> Tax Increment Analysis <br /> In order to estimate the amount of TIF revenues generated by the proposed development, certain assumptions were <br /> made based on the value of the project, construction schedule, and anticipated financing terms. <br /> • Estimated base value(2 parcels)as of Jan. 1, 2013 <br /> 0 75-741-0182(EMV of$14,600) <br /> 0 75-753-0010 (EMV of$296,500) <br /> ■ anticipated to be reclassified as 4d rental following development <br /> • Estimated incremental market value upon completion <br /> o $7,869,290 estimated market value <br /> 0 84 total townhome units <br /> ■ 35 2-bedroom units <br /> • $105,000 per unit(preliminary assessor's estimate) <br /> ■ 49 1-bedroom units <br /> • $84,000 per unit(preliminary assessor's estimate) <br /> • Increment based on new building value only <br /> • Construction commences in 2014 and is completed in spring 2015 <br /> 0 70%assessed in January of 2015 for taxes payable in 2016 <br /> 0 100%assessed in January of 2016 for taxes payable in 2017 <br /> • 0%Annual market value inflator <br /> • Present value(discount) rate of 4% <br /> • Tax rates, class rates and future market values remain constant <br /> • 90%increment pledged to developer <br /> • Maximum term of housing district(26 total years) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.