My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8.3. SR 10-07-2013
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2013
>
10-07-2013
>
8.3. SR 10-07-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2013 9:59:43 AM
Creation date
10/4/2013 9:39:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
10/7/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of <br /> Elk - Request for Action <br /> River O. <br /> To Item Number <br /> Mayor and City Council 8.3 <br /> Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by <br /> General Business October 7, 2013 Chris Leeseber ,Park Planner- Planner <br /> Item Description Reviewed by <br /> Discuss Allowed Pool Barrier Types Jeremy Barnhart,Deputy Director, CODD <br /> Reviewed by <br /> Cal Portner, City Administrator <br /> Action Requested <br /> Direction by consensus as to two questions: <br /> 1. What is the city's role in protecting pool owners; and <br /> 2. Are pool covers an acceptable barrier in lieu of fencing? <br /> Background/Discussion <br /> Currently, the city requires barrier fences as a measure to require a level of safety on private property. <br /> After the initial construction of the pool,there are no scheduled inspections of the safety measures. <br /> If the city decides private property safety is their responsibly, staff will recommend changes to the <br /> applicable ordinances regarding fencing and gate requirements, and annual inspections,including a <br /> process to monitor and inspect pools on a yearly basis to insure compliance,regardless of what is decided <br /> for allowed barriers. The intent of this is to make sure that all safety devices are in place and in working <br /> order. This would increase work load on a limited staff time/budget. <br /> If the Council feels the city should not be in the business of regulating pool safety within private <br /> property,then the means a property owner utilizes to protect their pool should be decided by the <br /> property owner and not be subject to standards,permits, and inspections. <br /> ASTM standards <br /> At the June 3, 2013, City Council meeting, staff outlined the history of the ordinance as it related to pool <br /> fencing and automatic pool covers. The Council directed staff to bring back information regarding the <br /> ASTM F1346—91 standards for pool covers. <br /> Staff reviewed several pros and cons between fences and pool covers. Price,installation, and aesthetics <br /> were reviewed and each product has compelling reasons to use them. The issue is that if the city desires <br /> to regulate pool safety,an action has to occur to render a pool safe, the cover must be employed. <br /> Barriers are not childproof,but they provide layers of protection for a child when there is a lapse in adult <br /> supervision. Barriers give parents/guardians additional time to find a child before the unexpected can <br /> occur. It is also understood that any barrier can be overcome by a willing person. <br /> ASTM F1346-91 Standard <br /> Some of the performance requirements for ASTM specification F1346-91 are summarized: <br /> P a w E A E U a r <br /> NaA f RE] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.