Laserfiche WebLink
MAR-13-03 THU 09:42 AM MMUA FAX NO. 7635510459 P. 02/02 <br /> LMC 145 University Avenue West,St,Paul;MN 55103-2o44 <br /> 1„g„a ohfi„weis atiat Phone: (6$x)281-saoo U (800)925-u22 <br /> Ctna,b.d.a�ea.YaMea Fax: (651)281-1299 0 TDD(651) 281-1290 <br /> INFORMATION SHEET <br /> SF 2l4; Wage Freeze <br /> Proposed Leeislatiop: The proposed legislation would institute a freeze on salaries and wage <br /> rates for state and public employees. <br /> ,League of Minnesota Cities Position: The League supports local decision making authority <br /> and opposes legislation intended to interfere in local employment-related decisions. <br /> D Local units of government are in the best position to decide how to manage proposed local <br /> government aid cuts for their cities. Local officials have the tools and the authority to <br /> implement a wage freeze for their employees if they decide that is in the best interest of their <br /> city and their taxpayers. <br /> D Local officials may decide that other ways of reducing wage and benefit expenses work best <br /> in their cities. For example,some cities are considering voluntary unpaid leave programs, <br /> early retirement incentive programs,voluntary reductions in work hours and other methods <br /> of achieving wage and benefit cost savings. <br /> D. The proposed legislation gives an advantage to unionized employees. It will result in <br /> situations in some cities where they have substantial portions of their work force receiving <br /> wage increases in 2003 and 2004 and only a small portion of the work force feeling the <br /> effects of a wage freeze. This is likely to be perceived by employees as very unfair. <br /> 9 The bill does not address the problem ofpotential lawsuits from employees who believe they. <br /> had an expectation and promise of a wage increase based on the city's compensation plan at <br /> time of hire or from union employees who believe it is a violation of their right to bargain <br /> collectively. There are costs to defend such suits whether they are successful or not <br /> D The bill penalizes employees in their"high 5”years of public employment. Public <br /> employment pension benefits for city employees are based on the highest five years of <br /> earnings as a city employee. Those who are unfortunate enough to be in their final five years <br /> of employment during the wage freeze will have their pension benefits permanently affected <br /> as a result of this bill. <br /> D. Wage freezes do not save money in the long run. Wages inevitably need to be"caught up"to <br /> the market so that cities can attract and retain qualified employees. <br /> 9 The wage freeze penalizes cities that have taken prudent fiscal measures to prepare for local <br /> aid cuts and have budgeted appropriate funds to pay for employee wage increases. <br /> 9 The wage freeze creates severe recruitment and retention problems for certain classes of <br /> employees that are in high demand such as registered nurses for city hospitals. <br />