My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.1. PCSR 05-25-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2000-2005
>
2004
>
05-25-2004
>
5.1. PCSR 05-25-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2013 12:04:19 PM
Creation date
9/17/2013 12:02:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
5/25/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r ri a <br /> 1,2a I fowarc R. Greer Compary <br /> May 10, 2004 <br /> File: 823650J-0240 <br /> Mr. Chris Leeseberg <br /> City of Elk River <br /> 13065 Orono Parkway <br /> Elk River, MN 55330 <br /> RE: POWELL PETERSON, INC. <br /> BMS INVESTMENTS, LLC. <br /> Dear Mr. Leeseberg: <br /> As requested, we have reviewed the site plan information submitted for the proposed Powell <br /> Peterson truck terminal to be located on Lot 1, Cascade Industrial Park off of Jarvis Street. <br /> Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc., of Anoka, Minnesota, prepared the information we reviewed. <br /> Based on our review, we would offer the following comments: <br /> 1. The site is proposing two access points onto Jarvis Street: one that leads directly into <br /> the 6,000 square foot building, and the second that leads into the parking lot to the <br /> south of the building. We would recommend that this site be limited to one driveway <br /> access off of Jarvis and have an internal connection to the parking lot. <br /> 2. The primary and secondary drain field sites are shown just north of the building near the <br /> front of the lot. It will be important that this area be well-protected during the grading of <br /> the site, since the majority of the remaining site is to have grading accomplished on it. <br /> 3. The parking area and the drive to the proposed building appeared to have curb and <br /> gutter around them and appear to be hard-surfaced, although it is not called out what <br /> type of material. The material type should be noted along with the type of concrete curb <br /> and gutter. The remaining portion of the site, again, is not noted as to the type of <br /> surfacing. At this point, we can only assume that it will be some sort of gravel surfacing. <br /> There are proposed yard bumpers around the perimeter. The site is graded to drain <br /> from east to west into the large ponding area located on the rear of the lot. A major <br /> concern would be what will keep the fine gravel material from washing into the ponding <br /> area under heavy rainfalls, and essentially plugging the pond bottom, eliminating <br /> infiltration? Some means of protecting against the gravel material ending up in the <br /> pond needs to be provided on this site. <br /> It appears that a portion of the north part of the gravel yard area will actually drain off to <br /> the north onto the adjacent property. Some adjustments to the proposed grading plan <br /> need to take place to ensure that the drainage will stay on the site and/or follow the <br /> drainage and utility easements along the perimeter to the ponding area. <br /> Ltr-051004-Leeseberg.doe <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.