Laserfiche WebLink
Case File:V 13-04 Granite Shores <br /> Page 2 <br /> prohibited does it mean they can be installed. The DD does not list them as an allowed uses in any <br /> manner. If it did,it would also regulate the size, height, and setbacks which it does not. The ordinance is <br /> clear as to its intent and desire. <br /> Freestanding vs. Monument Signs <br /> The applicant is suggesting that staff has made its decision based on the definitions of the two sign types. <br /> Staff indicated in their letter dated May 8, 2013 to the applicant that new freestanding or monument signs <br /> are not allowed as a permitted, conditional, or accessory use as the only signage allowed by the city.zoning <br /> ordinance in the DD is wall-mounted and projecting signs. The definitions of the sign types are <br /> irrelevant to the decision. <br /> ATTACHMENTS <br /> • Location Map <br /> • Section 30-1026 <br /> • Section 30-872 <br /> • Appeal of Zoning Decision Application Project Narrative <br /> • Staff letter to applicant dated May 8, 2013 <br /> • Building Permit <br /> • Definitions <br /> • Email from applicant to Wendy Simenson date July 2, 2013 <br /> • Chamber of Commerce letter dated June 18, 2013 <br /> • Decklan Group letter dated March 20, 2013 <br /> Action Motion by Second by Vote <br /> Follow Up <br /> N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\V\V 13-04 Granite Shores\V 13-04—Staff report granite shore decklan group 7-9- <br /> 13.docx <br />