7.2. SR 09-16-2013 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i Grading/ Drainage The grading plan requires a retaining walls near the parking lot on the east side, and adjacent to Yankton on the west side of the project. The walls are approximately 3-3.5 feet high. At 36 inches, some sort of drop-off delineation should be provided. Hedges or fencing is most typical. Regardless of solution, more detail should be provided. Further, the headlights of these cars will be about 6 feet above grade at the property line. To avoid headlight issues with adjacent parcels, headlight screening is recommended. The grading will collect rain water from the parking lot and funnel it to a linear rain garden along the street. The design details of this garden have not been submitted. All drainage will be collected in a shall depression on the north side of the building, then funneled to a wet bottom detention basin on the west side of Yankton. The pond will be approximately 9 feet deep at normal conditions. All storm water will need to meet the requirements of the city permit. Staff is not ready to recommend approval of the grading plan. Landscaping The landscaping plan has been prepared,but not by a landscape architect. The plan shows the minimum number of plants as required by the City Code. Staff recommends that the landscaping plan be revised, to further communicate the goals of the PUD zoning and prevent any detrimental effects on adjacent properties. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Subdivision These findings are necessary for the city council approval of the preliminary plat and the final plat: 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the tinning regulations(article VL of this chaptef) and confoglrm in all re peers with all requirements of this Code, including the tinning regulations and this article. 2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable general and specialised city, county, and regional plans, including, but not limited to, the do's comprehensive developmentplan. 3. The plysical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topograply, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and drainage are suitable for the type and densi�i of development and uses contemplated. 4. The proposed subdivision mares adequate provision for water szppy, stogm drainage, sewage transportation, erosion control and all other services,facilities and improvements otherwise required in this article. 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage. 6. The proposed subdivision will not coq flict with easements of record or with easements established by judgment. of a court.. 7. The proposed subdivision will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable development of neighboring land. 8. The proposed suhdivision is not premature.A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists. a. Lack of adequate stogmwater drainage. h. Lack of adequate roads. c. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. d. Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or sgpport ystems. In the review of the standards for Preliminary Plat as outlined, it appears that the request is consistent with all of these standards. N:\Departments\Community Development\Planting\Case riles\P\P 13-03 Heritage Maples\SR to PC Heritage Maples 9-10-13.docx