3.0 ERMUSR 02-10-2004 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page 2 Regular meeting of the Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission January 13, 2004 the cap has not been followed over the years. John Dietz states that he is in favor of contacting MNDOT before any further action is taken. A joint City Council/Utility Commission meeting will be scheduled near the end of March, and this problem is one of the items that will be discussed. It was noted that by the time of the joint meeting MNDOT will have replied to Terry Maurer's request for information. 5.1 Staff Up-dates Glenn Sundeen reported on the progress of jobs in construction, and the completion of other projects. He noted there were 53 new services installed in the last month. David Berg reported that Well #8 construction is underway, the current depth is 150 feet, and is on schedule. The security department sold two new security systems, and the meter department has been busy with installation and replacement of meters. Patricia Hemza reported that the office is busy wrapping up 2003 year end business, and that the GASB rule changes have been completed. Bryan Adams presented Commission with a detailed cost of Well #8 relocation, and a memorandum to the Park and Recreation Commission from the Park Planner. The memorandum considers park maintenance costs for Royal Valley Park. The proposal contains an item that makes the Elk River Municipal Utilities responsible for the maintenance of the prairie plantings. The Commission had agreed to a $1,000.00 expense for trees. The Commission and Staff discussed the topic regarding the costs of the well relocation, and the donation of trees to the park. James Tralle stated that he does not agree with the maintenance portion of the proposal, and John Dietz agreed. John Dietz moved to pay the costs, not to exceed $1000.00 for deciduous trees,but no maintenance charges. Jerry Takle seconded the motion. Motion carried 3-0. Bryan Adams, and Terry Maurer discussed with the Commission the proposed interchanges, and overpasses on Highways 101, and 169. 5.3 Review and Adopt GASB 34 The Capital Asset Guide, which is the document that will comply with Governmental Accounting Standards Board(GASB) Statement 34 was presented for the consideration of the Commission. Discussion between Staff, and Commission centered on the depreciation schedules, the combining of certain capital accounts, and the changes that may be seen on the monthly financial figures. James Tralle moved to approve the Capital Asset Guide for the satisfaction of GASB 34. Jerry Takle seconded the motion. Motion carried 3-0.