My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2. ERMUSR 01-13-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2004
>
01-13-2004
>
5.2. ERMUSR 01-13-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2013 9:49:09 AM
Creation date
9/5/2013 9:49:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
1/13/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
El Public Power Weekly December 15,2003 <br /> Ruling requires Washington cities to pay for streetlights <br /> The provision and maintenance of and the streetlight serc ice the vrcc-eked streetlighting into a proprietary func- <br /> treetlights is a governmental,not pro- or the burden that they prod need.-'the Lion, the court said. <br /> prietar ,function and mustbe paid for court said. Also.despite the 2002 law,"the charge <br /> by the city government, not utility The tax was unlawful under the state hr maintaining streetlights is still a tax, <br /> ratepayers, the Washington State Su- constitution, the court said. "For a mu- because shifting the streetlight costs to <br /> preme Court ruled last month. nicipality to exercise the power to tax,it City Light ratepayers is still designed to <br /> Streetlights are "provided for the must have express statutory authority." raise revenue for the general city bud- <br /> welfare of the general public, at the The 2002 law did not transform get." the court said. I <br /> discretion of the city and not individual <br /> ratepayers,"said Justice MaryFairhurst. <br /> The function is governmental and <br /> should be paid for through taxes. An • • <br /> electric utility is a proprietary function <br /> of government because it does"not pro- <br /> 3a <br /> vide electricity to a customer that does <br /> not request service." <br /> The decision in Rud Okesan et at v. the _ <br /> City of Seattle overturns a 2002 state law sxa^t Dal 1P <br /> allowing municipalities to charge <br /> Kai wit •fi!!t <br /> ratepayers for operation and mainte- IQ s" r11 01$�� _ <br /> • <br /> nance of streetlights. net III f" �-With costs around $6 million per tll <br /> year, the average City Light residen- a x " -- <br /> -1,r r,. � t <br /> tial customer has been paying about$2 per month for streetlights," said <br /> Tim Ritch, Seattle City Light's acting - - -- s — - <br /> — <br /> .—r -_ ...- <br /> apenntendent. _ <br /> Additionally,the courtsaid the charge — "- <br /> imposed on City Light customers is a tax " <br /> and not aregulatoryfee since the money - <br /> " - <br /> raisedwasussedto cover a governmental = -y -- _ <br /> function and not a regulatory one. `'� . 'tit's_- v-t <br /> "There was no relationship between the Seattle City Light customers will no longer be charged for streetlight service and maintenance <br /> fee imposed on City Light customers thanks to a Washington State Supreme Court ruling. Photo courtesy Seattle•s Conveeron and visitors Bureau. <br /> PUBLIC POWER WEE�' Periodicals <br /> POSTAGE <br /> American Public Power Association PAID <br /> 2301 M St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037-1484 Washington, D.C. <br /> Address Service Requested and additional <br /> mailing offices 11111 1111LIJIHIi IHmi l lii, iI ILm l il llul <br /> 126*2***t**s***-x******5—DIGIT 55330 <br /> BRYAN ADAMS <br /> GENERAL MANAGER <br /> MUNICIPAL UTILITIES <br /> 322 KING AVE <br /> ELK RIVER MN 55330-2596 <br /> NEWSPAPER <br /> USPS 028-120 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.