My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2. PCSR 10-12-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2000-2005
>
2004
>
10-12-2004
>
2. PCSR 10-12-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2013 1:26:02 PM
Creation date
8/28/2013 1:19:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
10/12/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Findings Of Fact Chapter 11 <br /> The Planning Commission's decisions must be based on facts submitted at <br /> the public hearing and recorded in the minutes. Facts are also included in <br /> staff reports which should be made part of the minutes by reference. <br /> Planning Commissioners must always remember that any matter before <br /> them could be litigated. They must apply the facts of each agenda item to <br /> the applicable law, normally the standards in the ordinance. Based upon this <br /> application of facts to the law, the Commission must find reasons or <br /> rationale upon which their decision to recommend approval or denial is <br /> based. These reasons or rationale are referred to as Findings of Fact. <br /> There must be an adequate factual basis in the record to support the legal <br /> reasons for the decision. Therefore, these findings must be clearly stated and <br /> recorded in the minutes in order to support the decision in the event that the <br /> action is legally challenged. <br /> Valid bases for findings include: <br /> A. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and it <br /> will not impede the normal and orderly development and <br /> improvement of surrounding vacant property. <br /> B. The proposed change is consistent with the land use map. <br /> C. The proposed zone change is appropriate because an error was made <br /> when drawing the original boundaries on the zoning map. <br /> D. The proposed use will not endanger, injure or detrimentally affect <br /> the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity. <br /> E. With the conditions placed upon it, the proposed project will not <br /> contaminate groundwater. <br /> F. Strict adherence to the zoning ordinance would impose an <br /> unnecessary hardship on the property owner. <br /> Minnesota Planning Association <br /> Citizen Planner Handbook Finding of Fact Page 48 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.