My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2. PCSR 10-12-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2000-2005
>
2004
>
10-12-2004
>
2. PCSR 10-12-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2013 1:26:02 PM
Creation date
8/28/2013 1:19:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
10/12/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
What is it with Planners and Planned Unit Developments? <br /> CONTINUED FROM PAGE 5 <br /> on the land in question,let alone forms of development that are consistent with the community's vision. Developers cannot <br /> afford to waste their time or capital on project proposals with a low chance of regulatory approval. If an outmoded municipal <br /> zoning code specifies a 50'minimum setback,no developer in his right mind is going to waste time developing a pedestrian- <br /> friendly design proposal with building entrances set at the sidewalk. Time and time again,developers tell me:"Tell us what <br /> you want,and that's what we'll bring you."The appropriate place for us to tell the development community what we want is <br /> in carefully considered comprehensive plans and zoning ordinances that are adopted with the consensus of our communities. <br /> We'll never get significant volumes of smart growth development until developers can build it"by right"with little risk of <br /> disapproval. <br /> If cities are,in fact,becoming more receptive to smart growth development patterns(and I think we are),why aren't more of <br /> us publishing smart growth zoning codes as an incentive to the development community to bring us smart growth development <br /> proposals? <br /> First,there are few good model ordinances—APA ought to be helping with this. There are more and more good examples out <br /> there all the time,but finding one that's appropriate for your community is still a hit or miss proposition. <br /> Second,I believe that many city staffs like forcing developers through the PUD process,because it provides leverage to <br /> negotiate concessions such as additional right of way for street improvements. <br /> Finally,we cannot discount the fact that the PUD process creates the ideal form of government for the visionary planner:a <br /> benevolent dictatorship—with the planner as benevolent dictator. <br /> new D ,ii , : ' <br /> Dan Cornejo is starting his own firm,Cornejo Consulting. Dan has 25 years public sector planning <br /> 1 0...�r�lar+almenta:: '' ' experience in the United States and Canada. For the past five years, Dan directed the Community <br /> Award& i�CibIdljS; ; Planning practice area of Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc(SEH). In his new venture, Dan will focus his <br /> . s efforts and expertise towards providing highly personal and specialized community planning and <br /> b rths PUbk abgl design services in the Twin Cities metro and other large-to medium-sized communities. <br /> li Qb pars l' yhrl Amy Denz recently joined 1000 Friends of Minnesota as the new Land Use Planner.She will be <br /> coordinating a new program at 1000 Friends called Growing by Design,which will offer planning <br /> li Sharathe littjp h$ *h services, including CommunityViz technology,to communities in Minnesota's Growth Corridor. Prior <br /> well as the bt Whet I+bnr ;- <br /> to her move to 1000 Friends,Amy was a planner principal with the Minnesota Department of <br /> it`Bil*WplBntil»Fa66 .I Natural Resources(DNR), coordinating the Wild and Scenic Rivers Program.Amy replaces Molly <br /> 4¢ur news ii'1eldox ' McCartney,who has taken a planning position with the City of Minneapolis. <br /> g0.01190.0.*!,4. ..511j1MIlliiiiNIDlltiiilliPi Ken P. Doresky joined the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency as a housing development officer in <br /> " "BI multifamily on July 9. Before that he was employed as the community development specialist by <br /> t rinelaslon:lnthehext <br /> � :: the City of New Hope for 31/2 years.Jon Sevald has joined Sherburne County as their County <br /> qe pf*n g'1 Planner. Previously, he was employed by the City of Andover as their Planning/Administration <br /> Minnesota ii Intern. Garneth Peterson,AICP, has joined SRF Consulting Group, Inc. as an environmental <br /> ' planner. Her new e-mail address is>rneterson @srfconsultinecom. <br /> • LAND USE PLANS <br /> v; <br /> Resource Comprehensive Planning . O. • ORDINANCES <br /> Development Regulations • Strategies • DEVELOPMENT REVIEW <br /> Site Planning&Design <br /> Development Review <br /> Corporation • STAFF SUPPORT <br /> • EAws.AUARs,ELSs <br /> ` �' Annexation <br /> Ann Perry • ANNEXATIONS <br /> Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. Dean Johnson • EXPERT TESTIMONY <br /> 5775 Wayzata Blvd., Suite. 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 14001 Ridgedale Drive, Suite 300,Minnetonka,MN 55305 <br /> Ph:952.595.9636 Fax:952.595.9837 planners @nacplanning.com (952) 513-9548 • (fax) 513-9549 • rscmn @spacestar.net <br /> i 6, :: , + vial D111 9 ":*s,A n .,u • ` III; 7 c .... .: <br /> re planning 14. .°d <br /> September 2004 minnesota <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.