4.7. SR 08-05-2013 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

C1, I9oes floe plan document each jurisdiction's existlin�g authorities, Flooding- ,, pcwllcies, prograrrns and rs�uarc�s and its ability to expand on and MaaNtijurisdcto�rral improve these existing policies and programs?(Requirement Concerns, Fop,4-25. §201,6(c)(3)) Existing authorities primarily deal with the ,flood'hozord; ordinances and structural restrictions in the floodway and flood fringe districts are en orced. _.._.....__' C . Does the Plan addres s - each jurisdiction's participation in the NFIP Sable 4-9:Sherburne X and continued compliance with:NFIP requirements,as appropriate? County Communities (Requirement§2tt1 6(c)(3)(NN)) Participating in the NFIP. The county, the cities of Becker, Big Lake, Clear Labe, Elk River,Zimmerman, St. Claud,crud Princeton, and the Township of Pecker participate in the NFIP. C3. Does the Plan include goals to reduce/avoid long-term Table 5-1:Mitigation X vulnerabRities to the Identified hazards?(Requirement Strateg'i'es for All Hazards.The plan contains 1 overarching goals far mitigation, Additionally, each hazard has its own set of goals. C4, goes the Plan identify and analyze a comprehensive range of Mitigation Strategies, X specific mitigation actions and projects for each jurisdiction being pp,5-18;5-21, considered to reduce the effects of hazards,with emphasis on new Protection of and existing buildings and Infrastructure?(Requirement infrastructure within §261.6(c)(3)(ll)) each Jurisdiction is discussed in terms of dam failure and flooding, C5, Does the Flan contain an action plan that describes how the Mitigation Strategies, X actions identified will be prioritized(including cost benefit review), pp.5-2:5-21. implemented,and administered by each jurisdiction?(Requirement Estimated cost, §201.6(c)(3)(Nv))i(Requirement§201_6(c)(3)(NNi)) estimated benefit and � potential funding sources administered by each Jurisdiction is listed'under every action. Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool ,-51