My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2.7. ERMUSR 06-11-2013
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2013
>
06-11-2013
>
2.7. ERMUSR 06-11-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2013 10:22:41 AM
Creation date
7/15/2013 10:15:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
6/11/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
What's the Effect of Walvin the Per Claimant Statutory Liability Limit? <br /> If the city chooses the"waiver"pfiort,lhe city and LMCIT no longer can use the statutory limit of <br /> $500,000 per claimant as a defense. Because the waiver increases the exposure,the premium is <br /> roughly 3%higher for coverage under the waiver option, <br /> If the city waives the statutory limit, an individual claimant could therefore recover up to$1,500,000 <br /> in damages on a claim. Of course, the individual would still have to prove to the court or jury that <br /> s/he really does have that amount of damages. Also,the statutory limit of$1,500,000 per occurrence <br /> would still apply; that would limit the individual's recovery to a lesser amount if there were multiple <br /> claimants. <br /> Why Would the City Choose to Pay More to Get Waiver-Option Coverage? <br /> The statutory liability limit only comes into play in a case where <br /> • The city is in fact liable. MUM <br /> • The injured party's actual proven damages are <br /> greater than the statutory limit. The waiver option coverage does not <br /> give the city better protection. The <br /> Very literally,applying the statutory liability limit means benefit is to the Injured party. <br /> an injured party won't be fully compensated for his/her <br /> actual, proven damages that were caused by city negligence. Some cities as a matter of public policy <br /> may want to have more assets available to compensate their citizens for injuries caused by the city's <br /> negligence. Waiving the statutork ability limits is a way to do that. <br /> Other cities may feel that the apprdp idtq policy is to minimize the expenditure of the taxpayers' <br /> funds by taking full advantage of eVery p btection the legislature has decided to provide. There's no <br /> right or wrong answer on this point. It's a discretionary question of city policy that each city council <br /> needs to decide for itself, <br /> For claims the statutory tort liability limits don't apply to, it doesn't affect how the city's coverage or <br /> risk on those claims. Waiving the statutory tort limits has no effect on claims the statutory limits <br /> don't apply to. <br /> Effects of Waiving the Statutory Limits if there is Excess Coverage <br /> If the city has$1 million of excess coverage and chooses to waive the statutory tort limits,the <br /> claimants(whether it's one claimant or several)could then potentially recover up to$2.5 million in <br /> damages in a single occurrence. If the city carries higher excess coverage limits,the potential <br /> maximum recovery per occurrence is correspondingly higher. <br /> Carrying excess coverage under the waiver option is a way to address an issue that some cities find <br /> troubling: the case where many people are injured in a single occurrence caused by city negligence. <br /> Suppose, for example, that a city vehicle negligently runs into a school bus full of kids,causing <br /> multiple serious injuries. $1,500,000 divided 50 ways may not go far toward compensating for those <br /> A' I <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.