My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.3. SR 07-15-2013
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2013
>
07-15-2013
>
7.3. SR 07-15-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2013 2:07:49 PM
Creation date
7/11/2013 1:53:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
7/15/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The variance granted to Solid Rock Church is not consistent with the city of Elk River's <br /> comprehensive plan. The comprehensive plan is based on the foundation of"Building for the <br /> future". "Building for the future" means considering the past, present, and future. "Natural, <br /> cultural, and historic resources of the community are essential ingredients to Elk River's <br /> identity"was a statement that resonated through my mind when I read the intent of the variance <br /> requested by Solid Rock Church. Solid Rock Church states the variance will not alter the <br /> character of the locality because the proposed lots will exceed a majority of the surrounding lot <br /> sizes in the Brentwood neighborhood. The size of the lot may not affect the character of the <br /> neighborhood, but the plans for the lot will. Elk River states in the comprehensive plan that rural, <br /> undeveloped areas are part of the environment and that built and natural environments should <br /> coexist with one another. The Brentwood neighborhood is the essence of this component of the <br /> comprehensive plan because the neighborhood has been built around nature and the wildlife. It <br /> permits the lives of humans and nature to intertwine. It allows people to feel like he/she is living <br /> in the country, but still have access to all the amenities of town within minutes. Allowing Solid <br /> Rock Church to build on parcel C would eliminate this; it would eliminate an open, natural area, <br /> eliminating a natural environment, and in the end all that would remain are buildings. This would <br /> not be in harmony with the city of Elk River's comprehensive plan to "be sensitive to existing <br /> residential developments, environmental areas, wetlands, existing public parks, and open spaces <br /> when building new, expanded, or improved roadways". I understand this statement is intended <br /> for roadways, but it also applies to residential development in my mind. Wildlife preservation is <br /> highly valued in Minnesota. The lot that Solid Rock Church is planning to build a future staff <br /> home on is a valuable area to the local wildlife. The city of Elk River should take pride in the <br /> fact that there are deer in this area and that it is fostering a growing population. The local deer <br /> All information obtained from the City of Elk River Comprehensive Plan Building the Future of Elk <br /> River,August 2004 Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.