My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-15-2003 CC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
12-15-2003 CC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:17 AM
Creation date
1/13/2004 3:43:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
12/15/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes <br />December 15, 2003 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />4.10. Consider 2003 Budget Amendments <br /> <br />Finance Director Lori Johnson reviewed the 2003 budget amendments. <br /> <br />MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOTIN AND SECONDED BY <br />COUNCILMEMBER TVEITE TO APPROVE THE 2003 BUDGET <br />AMENDMENTS. MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />5. Open N[ike <br /> <br />Richard Gruys, 22347 Monroe Street- Discussed the definition of the Municipal Boundary <br />according to the NIZN Department of Administration. He quoted secdon 414.6 and gave out <br />a contact name and phone number for information on this section of the state code. This <br />section of the code discussed detachment of landowners from municipalities. <br /> <br />6.1. Request by City. of Elk River to Revie~v Updated Comprehensive Plan <br /> <br />Director of Planning Michele McPherson stated that this item had been tabled from the <br />November 17, 2003 Council meedng in order for the Planning and Park and Recreation <br />Com~rdssions, along with staff, to develop a nmeframe for implementation of certain <br />components of the Plan, as outlined in Ms. McPherson's staff report. She reviewed the <br />implementation procedure of the Plan and suggested a one year citywide development <br />moratorium. <br /> <br />Mayor K2inzing allowed citizens to speak on this issue. <br /> <br />Mike Ziegler, 9730 313a~ Avenue, Princeton-Stated that small builders from the Elk River <br />area would be hurt by this moratorium. He stated that the moratorium is discriminatory as it <br />would affect older people ~vho are ready to retire and ~vould not be able to sell or develop <br />their property for retirement purposes. <br /> <br />Duane Peterson, Park and Recreation Commissioner-Stated that both the Planning and the <br />Park and Recreation Commission put a tot of time and effort into their recommendation to <br />the Council. He stated that two years (moratorium) is needed to implement the Plan. <br /> <br />Scott Breuer, 16070 201~t Avenue-Stated that Elk River may have two years ~vorth of lots <br />that are ready for construction but these lots are owned by national builders and not local <br />builders. He stated that the moratorium would hurt b2s business. He suggested that the <br />Council consider other options. <br /> <br />Mark Pederson, Planning Commissioner-Stated that the moratorium would give the city <br />dine to review and plan for transportation and sewer and ~vater issues. He stated that after <br />six months of a citywide moratorium, parts of the city could be phased in to allow for <br />development. He questioned if the city could afford to have a moratorium in effect for two <br />years. <br /> <br />Mark Lee~ 10934 County Road 33-Stated that he is in favor of the moratorium and would <br />like to see it extended for a longer timeframe. He is concerned about the schools being able <br />to keep up with the current growth. He would like to see Elk River remain a more rural <br />community. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.