My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.4. SR 05-20-2002
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2002
>
05/20/2002
>
4.4. SR 05-20-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:31:50 AM
Creation date
6/24/2002 6:46:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
5/20/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />City Attorney, Chris Johnson <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Building and Zoning Adminisfrafor, Stephen Rohlf <br /> <br />DATE: April 24, 2002 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />Babinski House Located at 740 Proctor Ave., Elk River, MN <br /> (75-133-1405) <br /> <br />On Wednesday, April 24, 2002, Bruce West, Fire Chief; Tom Zerwas, Police Chief; Tom <br />Tyler, Police Detective, Terry Zajac, Building Inspector and Stephen Rohlf, Building and <br />Zoning Administrator made an inspection of the house located at 740 Proctor Avenue in <br />Elk River. Stephen Rohlftried to contact the property owner, Leonard Babinski, and his <br />son, Tom Babinski, regarding the inspection. Messages were left on both of their answering <br />machines on April 23, 2002. <br /> <br />The following observations were made during the inspection: <br /> <br />The structure was not secured. An old door was leaned against the hole where a <br />basement window was missing in the rear of the house. Slight pressure against a <br />door partially covering an upper story window dislodged the one nail holding it in <br />place. <br /> <br />The outside of the house and adjoining property were unsightly. The upper part of <br />the exterior was an unfinished brown coat of stucco, the fascia was untreated and <br />there was debris on the property (including piles of rubber roofing, litter and rusted <br />tracks from a bulldozer. The shingles looked new, however, though a reproofing <br />permit has not been issued. The roof and gable end vents were missing, which <br />allows water to infiltrate to the interior of the structure. The yard has been left to <br />grow wild. <br /> <br />Structurally the house appears sound. The framing members, I believe rough sawn <br />Doug Fir, still appeared solid, although they are now being exposed to the elements. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.