Laserfiche WebLink
Case File: P 13 -01 <br />CU 13 -06 <br />ZC 13 -03 <br />Easement Vacation <br />Kliever Lake Fields 4th <br />Page 5 <br />(The Easement vacation is not reviewed by the Planning Commission; information is provided for <br />additional background.) <br />The original development included a single, common lot, (Lot 49, Block 7 Kliever Lake Fields 3 "'). A <br />drainage and utility easement was placed over the entirety of this lot, to facilitate the provision of small <br />utilities (electricity, naturalgas, cable, telephone, etc.). With the redevelopment of the project, this common lot <br />(and its easement) are inconsistent ivith the development plans proposed. Although a replatting is proposed, <br />the easements remain in place until vacated. To date, the City has received one comment on the easement <br />vacation, from Center <br />oint Energy, who has placed utilities in the area to serve the then future Kliever Lake <br />Fields 3r°. It is thought that these utilities a ill fall within the proposed easements as part of the plat, <br />although this has not been confirmed. Staff does not support the vacation of the easement prior to agreement <br />by Centopoint Energy. <br />Preliminary Plat. <br />The proposed subdivision is a reduction on the number of units from the previous approval. The <br />applicant proposes 21 units where 48 units were to be located. The proposed housing style is one that is <br />not prevalent in the City of Elk River, and does offer an alternative to the attached townhome and <br />detached larger lot single family home. Color examples are attached. <br />Building plans. The project proposes a single level, slab on grade two -bed, two -bath residential <br />structure. The exterior of the structure will be finished in one of two options. Exteriors will consist of <br />vinyl shakes, vinyl lap siding, and stone. <br />Desigg. The front facade of the structures meet the design requirements of the R -3 zoning district. <br />However, the remaining exposed surfaces of the structures are lap vinyl siding and do not meet the <br />requirement. The PUD zoning designation allows the Council and the developer to agree on a number of <br />details, including the design details. The Planning Commission and City Council should review this to <br />determine if the proposal is appropriate for the area. The original assumption of the R3 zoning district <br />was of large, massive structures, elevating the need for visual interest and texture. This concern is <br />somewhat mitigated with the smaller buildings set at varying planes. The staff recommended landscaping <br />further addresses the issue. <br />Storage. The R -3 zoning district requires a certain amount of storage space, either in the form of a <br />basement, or a larger garage area. The proposal includes a slightly larger garage area, and roof trusses <br />designed to support 264 sq. ft. of storage above the garage, in an attic space. Staff supports this proposal. <br />Staff does not support additional detached storage. <br />Outlots. The proposed preliminary plat shows the drives and the parking areas to be platted at <br />oudots. Staff objects to this configuration, as in similar situations, in a number of years these properties <br />may become tax forfeit, and the City will either be forced to acquire them, or let them go to the market, <br />where their ability to provide and maintain service to. These oudots should be added to other lots. <br />Parks <br />Park dedication has been satisfied with the original development of Kleiver Lake Fields 3rd <br />N: \Departments \Community Development \Planning \Case Files \P \P 13 -01 Kliever Lake Fields 4th \SR to PC Kliever Lake Fields 4th 7- 11- 13.docx <br />