My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.1 SR 06-17-2013
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2013
>
06-17-2013
>
7.1 SR 06-17-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2013 10:40:17 AM
Creation date
6/13/2013 1:36:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/17/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The pipe in outlot B is 160 ft. in length. A 6 inch pipe of this length contains <br />235 gals of water. The estimated consumption for 3 buildings is 75gpd x <br />3units =225 gal. <br />The water in the line will be replaced once every day for 3 units and twice per <br />day for 6 units. Additionally each lot will have a lawn irrigation system <br />supplied from the home. It would appear based on this calculation water <br />quality should not be an issue. Tim Pomerleau discussed water quality with <br />the home owners in the 3 units which are the only users on a 6 inch. They did <br />not express any complaints about water quality. <br />4) Elk River Municipal Utilities recommends that the water main in oudot D be <br />extended and connect to the water main running alongside the County Road, on the <br />north boundary of the project to provide another feed into the development. This <br />should have been part of the original improvements, but was neglected. <br />The connection from outlot D to the county road was not made with the <br />original development. At the time of construction of the 1" — 3'd Additions there was <br />no water line in the CSAH 12 right of way. Has one been constructed since then? <br />The private water system within the development does not require an additional <br />connection to the public system for water quality or quantity. If the issue is more <br />regional and necessary for the entire development (Klievers Lake 1" through 3`s <br />Additions) then the cost should be borne by all the development not just by 21 lots. <br />Streets <br />5) All private drives should terminate in a barrier curb. <br />Plan revised as noted. <br />6) A Homeowners association agreement (pursuant to Minnesota Statutes ch. 515A, <br />article 2 for condominiums, or Minnesota Statutes ch. 515B, for townhome <br />subdivisions) will need to be prepared to govern the maintenance of the common <br />areas, private drives and utilities, prior to approval of the Final Plat. Please provide a <br />copy of those documents for review by the City Attorney as soon as possible. <br />A homeowners association will be created. <br />Landscaping /Vegetation <br />7) Comments regarding the landscaping will be forthcoming. These comments will be based <br />on the requirements of Section 30 -994 g -4. <br />R -3 residential versus Planned Unit Development zoning. <br />8) Staff supports the application to rezone to PUD to afford some flexibility from the strict <br />setback requirements, with the understanding that the project remain generally consistent <br />with R -3 zoning. The following comments are based on the review of Section 30 -994: <br />(2.a) Please provide materials and colors proposed for the project. Are all units the <br />same? Please identify interior storage areas. <br />(2.e) Please identify total square feet of the different building materials. <br />(3b) Please verify that the garage area meets the 584 square foot storage area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.