My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.7. SR 06-03-2013
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2013
>
06-03-2013
>
4.7. SR 06-03-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2013 1:22:06 PM
Creation date
5/30/2013 9:56:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/3/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> What's the Effect of Waiving the Per Claimant Statutory Liability Limit? <br /> If the city chooses the"waiver"opftoni"the city and LMCIT no longer can use the statutory limit of <br /> $500,000 per claimant as a defense. Because the waiver increases the exposure,the premium is <br /> roughly 3% higher for coverage under the waiver option. <br /> If the city waives the statutory limit, an individual claimant could therefore recover up to $1,500,000 <br /> in damages on a claim. Of course, the individual would still have to prove to the court or jury that <br /> s/he really does have that amount of damages. Also, the statutory limit of$1,500,000 per occurrence <br /> would still apply; that would limit the individual's recovery to a lesser amount if there were multiple <br /> claimants. <br /> Why Would the City Choose to Pay More to Get Waiver-Option Coverage? <br /> The statutory liability limit only comes into play in a case where <br /> • The city is in fact liable. Highlight <br /> • The injured party's actual proven damages are The waiver option coverage does not <br /> greater than the statutory limit. give the city better protection. The <br /> Very literally, applying the statutory liability limit means benefit is to the injured party., <br /> an injured party won't be fully compensated for his/her <br /> actual, proven damages that were caused by city negligence. Some cities as a matter of public policy <br /> may want to have more assets available to compensate their citizens for injuries caused by the city's <br /> negligence. Waiving the statutory liability limits is a way to do that. <br /> JI: °. <br /> Other cities may feel that the app't'dpriate policy is to minimize the expenditure of the taxpayers' <br /> funds by taking full advantage of eV�ry protection the legislature has decided to provide. There's no <br /> right or wrong answer on this point. It's a discretionary question of city policy that each city council <br /> needs to decide for itself. <br /> For claims the statutory tort liability limits don't apply to, it doesn't affect how the city's coverage or <br /> risk on those claims. Waiving the statutory tort limits has no effect on claims the statutory limits <br /> don't apply to. <br /> Effects of Waiving the Statutory Limits if there is Excess Coverage <br /> If the city has$1 million of excess coverage and chooses to waive the statutory tort limits, the <br /> claimants(whether it's one claimant or several) could then potentially recover up to$2.5 million in <br /> damages in a single occurrence. If the city carries higher excess coverage limits, the potential <br /> maximum recovery per occurrence is correspondingly higher. <br /> Carrying excess coverage under the waiver option is a way to address an issue that some cities find <br /> troubling; the case where many people are injured in a single occurrence caused by city negligence. <br /> Suppose, for example, that a city vehicle negligently runs into a school bus full of kids, causing <br /> multiple serious injuries. $1,500,000 divided 50 ways may not go far toward compensating for those <br /> �Ib� <br /> i <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.