Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 2 <br />Foes fight the tide of 'smart' water meters <br />• Brian Eason, USA TODAY 12.38a.m. EST February 15. 2013 <br />Often when new meters are installed, bills go up even without a rate increase, because old meters can read <br />lower levels of water than people are using. <br />(Photo: Andy Manis for USA <br />TODAY) <br />Moves to modernize water utilities across the U.S. are coming under fire from opponents who say the costs will outpace the benefits of new technology. <br />At issue are smart meters, new devices that measure water usage digitally, then transmit the data wirelessly to the utility. <br />Industry officials tout their efficiency — utilities can save money by getting rid of manual meter readers, for one 'thing. They also say the new meters will <br />help residents conserve water and monitor their usage online. <br />"If I call in right now and I say, 'My water bill went up by $100, why is that ? "' said Chris McNeil, senior account manager with energy giant Siemens, which <br />packages water meters with billing software. "There's no system in place to be able to answer that" in cities with older billing technology. <br />• Opponents, though, dismiss these as talking points with little basis in reality. <br />"That's really twisted — because really they're going to raise our bills," says Maria Powell, an environmental scientist from Madison, Ws. "The whole <br />premise that people are going to go online and look at their water usage day to day, it's baloney. Most people aren't going to do that." <br />The opposition mirrors that of fights against smart meters used by electric companies. Residents have bitterly opposed electric smart meters across the <br />country, with some success. StopSmartMeters.org, an advocacy group in California, reports that 13 city and county governments in the state have <br />banned smart meter installations within their areas. The fight over meters in Texas has become so heated that the Public Utilities Commission keeps <br />reports on smart meters prominently displayed on its homepage. Web visitors can read staff reports extolling the virtues of smart meters, alongside more <br />than 600 collected filings on the subject, many of them petitions from opponents. <br />Pike Research, a firm specializing in clean technology research, cited the fights over electric smart meters in revising downward its own projections for <br />the industry. But the firm still expects smart water meters to boom in coming years to an installed base of 29.9 million meters by 2017 from 10.3 million in <br />2011. <br />Delores Kester, also of Madison, complains that residents will bear high up -front costs, as utilities go about changing out thousands of functioning analog <br />meters. <br />"It's tough times for a lot of people," said Kester, who organized a petition opposing the meters. "Atlanta had non -stop problems with huge water rate <br />increases." <br />Indeed, the opposition comes at a time when residents are spending larger and larger shares of their household budget on water. Costs are easily <br />outpacing inflation, according to Fitch Ratings, a market research group. In the most extreme cases like Atlanta, residents are paying three times more <br />for water today than they were 10 years ago, as utilities grapple with costly infrastructure needs. <br />Often when new meters are installed, bills go up even without a rate increase because old meters can read lower levels of water than people are using. <br />isWhen new meters were installed in Greenville, Miss., some residents' bills doubled, increasing by hundreds of dollars in some cases, according to reports <br />from a local newspaper, the Delta Democrat Times. And in nearby Jackson, Miss., smart meters are projected to generate $60 million over 15 years, <br />money that will be earmarked for work on the city's crumbling water and sewer system, according to city documents. <br />httn: / /www.usatoday.com/story /news /nation/ 2013/02/01/ smart - water - meters -fight- utilities /1884677/ 2/27/2013 <br />