My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-12-2013 ERMU MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
02-12-2013 ERMU MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2013 4:22:24 PM
Creation date
4/25/2013 4:22:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUMIN
date
2/12/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
John Dietz said the numbers were great and would like to see the Utilities advertise these <br /> numbers more often. He also wanted a chart brought back showcasing ERMU's reliability <br /> numbers against other utilities. <br /> 5.3 Tax Exempt Financing <br /> For more than 100 years, the concept that one body of government should not tax another <br /> body of government has existed. Currently, the owners of municipal bonds are not required to <br /> pay federal income tax on the interest income they receive from the bonds. (And, the owners of <br /> federal bonds are not required to pay state and local income tax on the interest they receive from <br /> those bonds.) Municipal bonds are a tool that local government entities use to finance their <br /> critical infrastructures including but not limited to: electric, water, wastewater, and gas systems; <br /> roads and bridges; government buildings, schools, and hospitals. <br /> Beginning in 2010 and again with the recent "fiscal cliff' negotiations, Congress and the <br /> Executive branch have discussed making changes to the federal income tax exemption on <br /> municipal bonds. The elimination of these exemptions would result in one body of government <br /> taxing another. This would also result in a crippling effect on local government's ability to <br /> finance new (or maintenance on) critical infrastructures. The increased cost of money to finance <br /> these critical infrastructures would inevitably be passed on through taxes, fees, and rates. For <br /> municipal utilities, this additional cost of doing business places additional burdens on the <br /> utility's ability to remain competitive. <br /> The elimination of tax exempt financing does not provide any real savings to taxpayers. <br /> The savings at the federal level would just be passed down to taxpayers at the state and local <br /> level. Because of the ramifications of the elimination of tax exempt financing to municipal <br /> governments, this topic will be a priority for MMUA this year. <br /> Troy Adams asked the Commission to sign a resolution stating ERMU's support to <br /> preserve tax exempt financing. Discussion followed. <br /> Al Nadeau motioned to approve Resolution 13-1 "ERMU Support of the Preservation of <br /> Tax Exempt Financing." Daryl Thompson seconded the motion. Motion carried 3-0. <br /> 5.4 Aquifer and Ground Water Supply <br /> The 2012 summer drought was tough on ERMU's wells and aquifer and the predictions for <br /> 2013 are not looking any brighter. Every month, the wells are measured while they are flowing <br /> to see how drawn down the water is, or in other words, how far down the well our water is <br /> sitting. In 1997, ERMU had roughly 2,000 customers hooked up to ERMU's water system. In <br /> July of 1997, Well #3's water was flowing 46% of the way down the pipe. In 2012, ERMU had <br /> roughly 4,500 water customers and in July of 2012 the same well was 61% of the way down the <br /> pipe. <br /> Page 3 <br /> Regular meeting of the Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission <br /> February 12,2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.