My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR 05-06-2002
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2002
>
05/06/2002
>
SR 05-06-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:31:50 AM
Creation date
6/24/2002 5:54:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
AG
date
5/6/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />Item ~ 5 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Mayor and City Council <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Stephen Rohlf, Building and Zoning Administrator <br /> <br />DATE: May 6, 2002 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Gravel Audit <br /> <br />At last year's joint City Council/Sherburne County Board meeting, both bodies asked staff <br />to consider how to conduct an audit of the various gravel companies mining within the city <br />limits. The purpose of the audit is to check that the appropriate amount of gravel tax is <br />being paid. <br /> <br />The County Auditor, County Surveyor and myself pondered how to conduct such an audit <br />for quit a while before agreeing on what we think is the only feasible scheme. We propose <br />developing two sets of contour maps of the seven most active pits in Elk River, which <br />includes at least one pit from ev~'ry current operator. One contour map will show the <br />elevation of each of the seven pits in 1997 and the second will show their elevations in 2000. <br />From these two sets of contour maps the volume of what has been removed during those <br />years can be estimated. These estimated volumes can then be compared to the volumes the <br />gravel companies reported for tax purposes during those same years. <br /> <br />A proposal by Howard R. Green Company to conduct this work is attached. The cost <br />projections in the proposal include purchasing the aerial photos needed to develop the maps. <br />The city and county agreed to share the cost of the audit in an amount proportional to the <br />percent of the tax each receives from gravel. The total estimated cost of the project is <br />$30,460. The city's portion will be $9,138. If the Council agrees to go ahead with this <br />project they need to identify a funding source. The most logical source of funds is Council <br />Contingency. <br /> <br />Even though staff believes the proposal as outlined above is the best way of checking <br />reported volumes versus actual volume, there are some inherent problems. One problem is <br />that exact volumes cannot be accomplished using just contour maps. A margin of error will <br />have to be factored in, which will probably be at least 10%. In other words, the gravel <br />companies will have had to under report their volumes by a lot before we can confidently <br />call them on it. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.