My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.7. SR 04-08-2013
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2013
>
04-08-2013
>
6.7. SR 04-08-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2013 12:52:55 PM
Creation date
4/5/2013 12:14:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
4/8/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ICMA Knowledge Network <br /> Performance Evaluation of Managers <br /> July 7,2011 1 12:51 PM <br /> How do you evaluate a City/County Manager?What criteria and methodology would you <br /> typically use? In a recent Knowledge Network question, ICMA members and other KN users <br /> shared their thoughts and recommendations of performance evaluations of mangers, based on <br /> personal experiences. <br /> Managers emphasize the inclusion of the council members and immediate subordinates within <br /> the evaluation as a crucial step to receive comprehensive feedback. Wes Hare, city manager of <br /> Albany, Ore. described his own feedback process that involved the council as well as the HR <br /> director to discuss what each expected from the manager. This created open dialogue and <br /> enhanced communication between the council and manager. <br /> Another recurring issue is the instrument of performance evaluation. City manager of Maryland <br /> Heights,Mo. Mark Levin, pointed out that that since manager evaluations can range greatly <br /> from fulfilling a contractual obligation to providing a forum for an open and honest exchange, an <br /> effective and relevant evaluation must be outcome specific. However,members have reported <br /> dissatisfaction with standard evaluation forms, and have resorted to creating more fitting <br /> evaluation criteria. <br /> Curtis Davis, ex city manager of Johnstown,Pa. describes a performance measurement tool he <br /> created by listing all his major job responsibilities and evaluating himself, noting his strengths <br /> and weaknesses as well as the goals to be achieved in the coming year. The completed form was <br /> provided to all council members, who also used it to evaluate him. Finally, a joint discussion <br /> was held to discuss the points of agreements and disagreements, and benchmarks were set for the <br /> performance appraisal of the upcoming year. The process also compelled the council to discuss <br /> topic priorities for the city manger's agenda. <br /> Eric Levitt, city manager of Janesville,Wis.recounts that when council members were not <br /> satisfied with the evaluation criteria, they asked the staff to create one that reflected the priorities <br /> and qualities under which they hired a City Manager. <br /> Does your jurisdiction have an effective criterion for evaluating managers? Click here to <br /> contribute your experiences to the discussion. <br /> The Knowledge Network features many other discussions and articles on the topic as well as <br /> several sample evaluations: <br /> • City Manager Evaluation Form from Bonner Springs,Kans. that includes evaluation on <br /> supervision, leadership, council relations, execution of policy, and planning. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.