Laserfiche WebLink
Committing Fund Balance <br /> The Office of the State Auditor also recommends that a local government's governing body <br /> identify in its comprehensive fund balance policy its process for committing fund balance to a <br /> specific purpose. The policy could identify the local government's highest level of decision <br /> making authority, what formal action is required to commit fund balance, and what specific <br /> purposes normally will require committing resources. <br /> Assigning Fund Balance <br /> Furthermore, the Office of the State Auditor recommends each local government that decides to <br /> delegate the authority to assign fund balance for a specific purpose include in their <br /> comprehensive fund balance policy the body or official authorized to assign amounts to a <br /> specific purpose and the types of specific purposes that may be assigned by that delegated body <br /> or official. The policy should also specify how the amounts for such assignments are arrived at <br /> and whether the governing body will set the assignments annually or will set up a process to <br /> make the assignment based on the guidelines established by the governing body. <br /> Appropriate Fund Balance Levels <br /> The Office of the State Auditor recommends that, at year-end and/or at other key times of the <br /> year, local governments that rely significantly on property taxes maintain an unrestricted fund <br /> balance of approximately 35 to 50 percent of fund operating revenues or no less than five months <br /> of operating expenditures in their general fund and special revenue funds. This amount of <br /> unrestricted fund balance should provide the local government with adequate funds until the next <br /> property tax revenue collection cycle. The adequacy of unrestricted fund balance should be <br /> assessed based on an individual local government's own circumstances. If the local <br /> government's unrestricted fund balance is less than or greater than the recommended level, the <br /> local government should be able to explain the reason for the difference. <br /> According to the Minnesota Department of Education, Minnesota school districts, unlike most <br /> local governmental units, experience timing of receipts from local property tax levies, state aids, <br /> and federal aids that provide a more reliable flow of cash to fund operations. Therefore, a <br /> recommended unrestricted fund balance for school districts may be less than the amounts <br /> recommended above for other local governmental units. Each school district should determine <br /> the appropriate level of unrestricted fund balance based on the school district's circumstances. <br /> Local governments should also consider taking a position on the level of unrestricted fund <br /> balance in other funds that have unrestricted revenues. In setting an appropriate level, the local <br /> government should consider any long-term forecasting/planning issues to avoid the risk of <br /> placing too much emphasis on the level of unrestricted fund balance at any one time. <br /> Reviewed: July 2012 6 2010-1003 <br /> Revised: July 2012 <br />