My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.2. SR 04-08-2013
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2013
>
04-08-2013
>
6.2. SR 04-08-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2013 2:12:06 PM
Creation date
4/5/2013 12:07:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
4/8/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
"stabilization arrangements." For a government to be able to set aside these types of funds as <br /> restricted or committed, they need to specifically define when these amounts may be used and <br /> specify a situation that cannot be expected to occur routinely. For example, identifying funds to <br /> be accessed "in an emergency" does not sufficiently detail the circumstance or condition that <br /> must be met for the funds to be considered committed. To commit these funds, the government <br /> needs to be more specific in defining an emergency.,, If the arrangement meets these <br /> requirements, it would be considered a specific purpose and reported as either restricted or <br /> committed, depending on the source of the constraint. Stabilization arrangements that do not <br /> meet the requirements should be reported as part of unassigned fund balance in the general fund. <br /> Appropriated Fund Balance <br /> Usually a local government only classifies fund balances at year end for financial reporting <br /> purposes. Thus only current, and not future, net resources are classified. Typically, the <br /> subsequent year's budgeted expenditures are expected to be paid from the subsequent year's <br /> revenues and not the current reporting year's ending fund balances. On occasion, local <br /> governments will "deficit" budget, or in other words, budget more expenditures than anticipated <br /> revenues and drawdown beginning fund balance for the subsequent year. An appropriation of <br /> existing fund balance to eliminate a projected budgetary deficit in the subsequent year's budget <br /> in an amount no greater than the projected excess of expected expenditures over expected <br /> revenues satisfies the criteria to be classified as an assignment of fund balance.8 <br /> Recommendations <br /> Adoption of Comprehensive Fund Balance Polic <br /> p P y <br /> q <br /> The GASB's Statement No. 54, Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type <br /> Definitions, identifies fund balance accounting policies that a local government may have or <br /> should consider. The Office of the State Auditor recommends that each local government <br /> establish/approve a formal comprehensive fund balance policy relating to accounting and <br /> financial reporting of governmental fund balances. A local government's fund balance policy <br /> k could address the following areas: <br /> • Minimum fund balance <br /> • Order of resource use <br /> • Stabilization arrangements <br /> • Committing fund balance <br /> • Assigning fund balance <br /> Minimum Fund Balance <br /> The Office of the State Auditor recommends that local governments determine and establish in <br /> their fund balance policy a desired minimum level of unrestricted fund balance to maintain in <br /> their general fund and other significant governmental funds. The local government's governing <br /> 8 GASB Statement No.54,$ 16. <br /> Reviewed: July 2012 4 2010-1003 <br /> Revised: July 2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.