My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.2. SR 04-08-2013
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2013
>
04-08-2013
>
6.2. SR 04-08-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2013 2:12:06 PM
Creation date
4/5/2013 12:07:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
4/8/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Objectives <br /> ■ No change from March 11, 2013,work session review. <br /> Revenue and Expenditure <br /> ■ No change from March 11, 2013,work session review. <br /> Utilities <br /> ■ No change from March 11, 2013,work session review. <br /> Cash Management <br /> ■ No change from March 11, 2013,work session review. <br /> Investments <br /> ■ No change from March 11, 2013,work session review. <br /> Fund Balance <br /> • Staff reviewed best practices of the GFOA, State Auditor's office, and several communities in <br /> regards to reserve policies. <br /> • With the implementation of Governmental Accounting Standard Board (GASB) Statement No. <br /> 54, fund balance was reorganized into several categories: Nonspendable,Restricted, and <br /> Unrestricted. In the past, the city's practice was to transfer out any amount above the minimum <br /> to fund capital projects or other one-time expenditures. This has really helped in the replacement <br /> of capital assets and future capital assets that would otherwise need to be included in the General <br /> Fund budget. Over the past several years,with the decline in values and other variables in the <br /> budget,we have kept any amount above the minimum for discussion in the next budget cycle. <br /> With Statement No. 54 we can only assign fund balance in the General Fund that we are using for <br /> the next subsequent budget,not future budgets. During our recent audit, the auditors reviewed <br /> Statement No. 54 and the revised guidance to make sure we comply with GASB. Statement No. <br /> 54 is reprinted for your reference. <br /> Paragraph 16 of GASB Statement No. 54 <br /> 16. An appropriation of existing fund balance to eliminate a projected budgetary deficit in the subsequent year's <br /> budget in an amount no greater than the projected excess of expected expenditures over expected revenues <br /> satisfies the criteria to be classified as an assignment of fund balance. As discussed in paragraph 15, <br /> assignments should not cause a deficit in unassigned fund balance to occur. <br /> What this means is that the amount above our maximum we will transfer out to a Capital Project <br /> Fund and we still have the flexibility of each budget cycle to make an annual transfer in similar to <br /> the way it may have been done in the past. <br /> • For over 20 years we have not increased our minimum amount greater than 40% of next year's <br /> budget. Maintaining fund balance in the General Fund is important to provide cash flow between <br /> revenue collections (tax settlements),tax delinquencies, tax court cases, unforeseen circumstances, <br /> capital expenditures,and a strong financial condition and credit rating. With the growth of the city <br /> and budget over those years, staff would like to discuss putting a range with a minimum and <br /> maximum percentage. Attached is a survey of AAA rated cities and their General Fund policy <br /> N:\Public Bodies\City Council\Council RCA\Agenda Packet\04-08-2013\Financialpolicyupd2tepartlLdocx <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.