Laserfiche WebLink
illAVISII11 <br /> iiiiivSeg <br /> • Minnesota Municipal Utilities Association <br /> energy sales. The increased energy Environmental Regulatory Timeline for Coal Units <br /> costs from these programs have <br /> resulted in multiple rate increases <br /> Ozone 502/NO2] CAIR Water <br /> on our customers. These costs come mm g 30.2 Ramry <br /> at an unprecedented time of reduced Rednd Cg1R Phase Bemnudrzl nMUC Effluent Guidelines P Seasonal Effluent GutMPnee <br /> OMO Nos Cep °ne Proposed Reel mbeepetled <br /> commercial and manufacturing MGa RM°B Ree'aaaeant Final CAIR G6 N6 Ozone m;m;nb Y. <br /> CHIC Rule Epenled Replsemen, 9evaNVY NM08 ReNtlpn <br /> activity, high unemployment, 'Vacated OA E.peeleo LAMBS „ ej CanpFnce <br /> EMwnl 31fi1d1 ontlask 11 Ne elrpeen rule <br /> reduced property values and tax R N6 a,de,nes eeponbd <br /> revenue in cities, and concerns about nd s Ns l �dl, <br /> economic vitality both locally and <br /> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br /> nationally. The new EPA regulations <br /> will only multiply these rate I " <br /> PM 25 B gn PM2S <br /> Y P y Sips due e g LAIR <br /> " RU slPae So g gCAIR <br /> increases. The new EPA regulations m' Rule a NAAOS I °fit 9nefions°B A °tl CAP Phase <br /> g Annual^ SC Cap COBB IM o In CompIl a SD_8N0 Cops II Seasonal <br /> are, simply put, "too much, too soon." NO.Cap mgro I Bag NOS Cap <br /> Rpwmnenlsunder Complonce,m <br /> Proposed Fine]CCB Rub 6PIB <br /> Rub for CCBs Fns EPA (groundwater Replacement Rue <br /> The Clean Air Act— Me-timed Nonaranman' monl B doable <br /> rule eryecled Proposed CeYgnesoeo menden closure. <br /> the Wrong Tool dry ash conversion) <br /> PMZS Ash I I 1 i 1 rCt <br /> When Congress enacted the major <br /> provisions of the current Act, the <br /> main focus of the legislation was addressing MMUA Position <br /> improvements in the <br /> traditional criteria pollutants, such as soot or MMU A supports continuin continuing im p <br /> agricultural dust (particulate matter), smog and quality of the nation's air and believes that such <br /> other hazardous air pollutants. There is no record improvements can be made in a sensible fashion <br /> indicating that Congress anticipated these same without damaging the economy, so long as there <br /> regulatory structures would one day be used to is a full understanding of the cost of the proposed <br /> control a substance as ubiquitous as CO2, for which regulations. Credit for early adoption of measures <br /> no effective control technologies exist even today. already taken needs to be included in any new <br /> The recent court ruling to vacate the Cross State regulatory scheme. <br /> Air Pollution Rule (CASPR) is an example of how <br /> ill-suited the Act is for the broad purposes to which MMUA urges the Administration to recognize <br /> the EPA is applying it. One of the law's principal the cumulative impact of all EPA climate change <br /> authors, Rep. John Dingell (D-MI), famously said and air quality regulatory activity on jobs and <br /> that using the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse American economic competitiveness. In doing so, <br /> gases would result in a "glorious mess." Congress the Administration should draw on expertise not <br /> did not intend it to be used to require reductions or only from the EPA, but also from agencies having <br /> limitations on greenhouse gases blamed for global expertise in and responsibility for the economy and <br /> warming or climate change, which arises from the electric system. The Administration should <br /> global concentrations of GHGs, caused from sources Produce an objective cost-benefit analysis of all of <br /> around the world. Without a change in direction, EPA's current and planned regulation. <br /> EPA and the courts risk forcing untenable <br /> requirements on the electric industry at the same MMUA further urges the EPA, Congress, and the <br /> time the agency is already struggling to address White House not to impose any new air quality <br /> an extensive menu of costly air pollution problems. regulations until the impacts of current regulations <br /> The nature of the climate change issue demands a can be absorbed. <br /> lifferent response. <br /> 2013 Federal Position Statements/ 15 <br />