Laserfiche WebLink
HSMNILf <br /> IVIIVIU Position Statement <br /> •Minnesota Municipal Utilities Association <br /> Rail Shipping: The Need for Reform <br /> Background <br /> Railroad transportation is the <br /> principal method of delivering <br /> coal to the electric generation X ' -- <br /> facilities that provide power to 5 ,* <br /> Minnesota municipal utilities imi I <br /> �/ ' <br /> and their customers. This heavy k', I <br /> reliance on rail has left these .f I �' I� 1', I l <br /> utilities vulnerable to significant ���11 <br /> market power abuses caused by �� � � � b <br /> the absence of competitors in the � �h i ' =a r - ■( I <br /> railroad industry. Utilities and -' IT, ' ' -- ■ <br /> _ i -,_ . <br /> other rail commodity shippers, I -:-k <br /> including those who are served <br /> by only one railroad and are <br /> often referred to as captive <br /> shippers, are facing significant <br /> rate increases due to the lack train photos by Jim Ramnes <br /> of competition in the railroad <br /> industry. number of Class I railroad companies in the United <br /> States was reduced from 42 to 4. This has resulted <br /> Freight railroads have been exempt from the in a duopoly of two major railroads serving the <br /> nation's antitrust laws since the mid-20th century, western regions of the U.S. and a similar duopoly of <br /> but until 1980 they were subject to tight regulation two railroads serving the East. <br /> by the Interstate Commerce Commission. By the <br /> late 1970's, the industry was in poor financial The lack of real competition in the railroad <br /> condition with an excess of capacity. In an effort industry, coupled with an absence of effective <br /> to revive the rail industry, Congress in 1980 regulation of industry operations, has significantly <br /> deregulated competitive rail service and allowed undermined the operations of many Minnesota <br /> the railroads to shed their excess capacity. municipal utilities. Shipping costs are skyrocketing <br /> Railroads were free to shed marginal routes as current contracts expire and unreasonably high <br /> and enter into long-term shipping contracts. new rates are set with virtually no negotiation. <br /> Unfortunately, in 1980, Congress failed to remove Furthermore, even as the railroads dramatically <br /> the industry's antitrust exemptions. increase their rates, in a number of cases their <br /> service has actually declined. <br /> The consolidation of the railroad industry that has <br /> occurred over the last 30 years has been stunning. While the railroads argue that any rail customer <br /> When Congress passed the Staggers Rail Act in legislation is an attempt at re-regulation, the goal <br /> 1980, the resulting industry deregulation was of rail customers is not a return to the regulation of <br /> supposed to usher in a new era of competition the 1970's, but rather a national rail policy that will <br /> that would benefit customers. Unfortunately, the ensure reliable rail transportation and reasonable <br /> legislation spawned a new era of unprecedented rates for all rail customers—particularly for <br /> :onsolidation rather than competition, as the continued on next page <br /> 2013 Federal Position Statements/ 9 <br />