My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.7. ERMUSR 03-13-2013
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2013
>
03-19-2013
>
5.7. ERMUSR 03-13-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2013 3:26:19 PM
Creation date
4/3/2013 3:26:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
3/13/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Nam in <br /> nmandg <br /> • Minnesota Municipal Utilities Association <br /> Minnesota municipal WAPA customers <br /> Ada Granite Falls Melrose Sleepy Eye <br /> Adrian Halstad Moorhead Springfield <br /> Alexandria Hawley Mountain Lake Staples <br /> Barnesville Henning Newfolden Stephen <br /> Benson Jackson New Ulm Thief River Falls <br /> Breckenridge Kandiyohi Nielsville Tyler <br /> Detroit Lakes Lake Park Olivia Wadena <br /> East Grand Forks Lakefield Ortonville Warren <br /> Elbow Lake Litchfield Redwood Falls Westbrook <br /> Fairmont Luverne St. James Willmar <br /> Fairfax Madison Sauk Centre Windom <br /> Fosston Marshall Shelly Worthington <br /> One of these proposals cuts to the heart of the fed- Another problematic proposal involves an ongoing <br /> eral government's foundational role as a steady, debate over building PMA transmission lines for <br /> affordable source of nonprofit power to nonprofit non-traditional purposes. A proposal to provide <br /> wholesale customers, including municipal utilities. additional funds for both WAPA and Bonneville <br /> Some policymakers, including both chairmen of the Power Administration was included in the stimulus <br /> President's Deficit Reduction Commission, have bill of 2009 to build new transmission facilities, pri- <br /> recommended switching to "market-based" rates for manly to connect non-hydropower resources to the <br /> federal power as a way to help deal with America's <br /> budget woes. grid. The Senate proposal, dubbed the Transmis- <br /> sion Infrastructure Program (TIP), was debated in <br /> Currently, and in accordance with federal law, the House in 2011 but no further action was taken. <br /> PMA "cost-based" rates are set at the levels <br /> needed to recover the costs of the initial federal Secretary Chu Proposal <br /> investment (plus interest) in the hydropower and In a March 16, 2012 memo DOE Secretary Steven <br /> transmission facilities. The PMAs annually review Chu set out a number of proposals that would <br /> their rates to ensure full cost recovery. None of create new roles for WAPA, to include designing <br /> the costs are borne by taxpayers. If a deficit is rate structures to promote electric vehicles, <br /> projected, rates are adjusted to eliminate any providing incentives for renewable energy, <br /> deficit. Power rates also help to cover the costs of expanding transmission for third parties, and <br /> other activities authorized by these multipurpose serving as test beds for research. <br /> dams such as navigation, flood control, water <br /> supply, environmental programs, and recreation. These proposals were met with a storm of protest <br /> PMA power is generally low-cost in relation to from WAPA customers when they were discussed <br /> other sources of electricity because hydropower in a series of"listening sessions" in 2012. On No- <br /> is a renewable resource and most dams were vember 19, DOE issued a Federal Register Notice <br /> constructed long ago, when material and labor costs featuring draft recommendations specific to WAPA <br /> were much lower than today. <br /> continued on next page <br /> 2013 Federal Position Statements/7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.