My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.7. ERMUSR 03-13-2013
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2013
>
03-19-2013
>
5.7. ERMUSR 03-13-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2013 3:26:19 PM
Creation date
4/3/2013 3:26:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
3/13/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
flIMINI Lq <br /> :nIIMvSig Position Statement • <br /> Minnesota Municipal Utilities Association <br /> Tax Exempt Municipal Bonds <br /> Background , <br /> Municipal bonds are debt obligations ;It "f `.x <br /> issued by states, cities, counties and other � I; . <br /> governmental entities, which finance many ./ <br /> projects for the public good including schools, <br /> bridges, hospitals, water and wastewater 111) <br /> treatment plants, and publicly-owned electric 1 I\ <br /> utility facilities. These bonds are desirable to t , <br /> investors because the interest investors earn <br /> from them is not subject to federal income ri,V- <br /> i <br />• t <br /> tax. 1 (.. <br /> The federal tax exemption on municipal _. <br /> p <br /> bond interest has been in lace since the l <br /> 1 <br /> enactment of the very first federal tax 'n'""r...°° — <br /> code in 1913. This has allowed state and <br /> local governments to save, on average, an air quality regulations. Without access to the <br /> estimated two percentage points on their borrowing savings traditionally available through tax-exempt <br /> to finance investment in public infrastructure, financing, project costs will be even higher. These <br /> which translates into a 25 percent savings in added costs will be passed on to consumers in the <br /> infrastructure costs over time. Over the past few form of higher taxes or utility bills. <br /> decades, tax-exempt financing has generated <br /> trillions of dollars of investment in vital public The increasing cost of building water and <br /> infrastructure, saving state and local governments wastewater treatment facilities offers an <br /> hundreds of billions of dollars in interest costs. important example of the continuing need for <br /> tax exempt financing. For many years after new <br /> Over the last century, state and local governments environmental standards for water and wastewater <br /> have been willing partners (together with the were established in the 1970's, federal and state <br /> federal government) in building the fabric of daily grants took care of up to 90% of the cost of building <br /> American life—power plants, transmission lines, treatment facilities to meet the new requirements. <br /> roads, bridges, elementary schools, universities, In the past few years, as the cost of these facilities <br /> airports, docks, water systems, housing, rail and has soared to ever greater levels, state and federal <br /> hospitals, all of which are financed with tax-exempt grants to fund these projects have shrunk to almost <br /> bonds. nothing. In communities where new facilities will <br /> be needed, the financial hardship caused by the <br /> As we look ahead to the financing needs of state loss or reduction of tax exempt financing would be <br /> and local governments in the relatively near particularly acute. <br /> term, access to tax-exempt financing may be Simpson-Bowles Begins Challenge <br /> more important than ever. Roads, bridges, and to Tax Exemption <br /> other basic infrastructure must be repaired or <br /> replaced at today's higher costs. Many municipal The most recent discussion about the value of the <br /> utilities and municipal power agencies will have tax exemption began as part of the larger effort <br /> to make major investments to upgrade or replace to reform the tax code and reduce the federal <br /> electric generating facilities in order to meet new budget deficit. In 2010, the Simpson-Bowles Report <br /> 4/ 2013 Federal Position Statements <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.