Laserfiche WebLink
City of t REQUEST FOR ACTION <br />El <br />• r <br />TO ITEM NumBER <br />Mayor and Citv Council 8.1 <br />AGENDA SECTION MEETING DATE PREPARED BY <br />General Business February 4, 2013 Rebecca Haug, Environmental <br />Administrator <br />ITEM DESCRIPTION REVIEWED By <br />Authorization for Ordinance Amendment Removing the Lawn Suzanne Fischer, Communitv <br />Fertilizer Applicator Licensing Requirement Operations & Development Director <br />REVIEWED BY <br />Peter Beck, City Attorney <br />ACTION REQUESTED <br />Authorize staff to proceed with an amendment to remove the licensing requirement from the lawn <br />fertilizer applicator ordinance. <br />BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION <br />On March 19, 2001, the Citv Council adopted Ordinance 01 -02 requiring Commercial Fertilizer <br />Applicators to obtain a license to apply fertilizer on properties in the city. The city conducted studies and <br />reviewed data on the water quality of Lake Orono and its tributary waterways. The data indicated that <br />lake water quality could be maintained or improved if the city regulated the amount of phosphorus and <br />other chemicals from fertilizer entering the lake as a result of stormwater runoff or other causes. <br />Since that time, the iNfinnesota Phosphorus Lawn Fertilizer Law was enacted in 2002 and amended in <br />2004. The law regulates the use of phosphorus fertilizer on lawns and turf with the intent of reducing <br />unnecessary phosphorus fertilizer use and preventing enrichment of rivers, lakes, and wetlands with <br />phosphorus. The law prohibits use of phosphorus lawn fertilizers unless new turf is being established or a <br />soil or tissue test warrants phosphorus application. Golf course staff trained in fertilizer applications and <br />sod farmers are exempt from these restrictions. The law also requires fertilizer of any type to be cleaned <br />up immediately if spread or spilled on a paved surface, such as a street or driveway. The Minnesota <br />Phosphorus Lawn Fertilizer Law is contained in Chapter 18C of the Minnesota State Statutes. <br />Staff surveyed 23 communities throughout the state about the status of licensing for Commercial <br />Fertilizer Applicators. Thirteen communities responded and all have discontinued requiring licensing <br />because the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (NVIDA) handles it and the process creates unnecessary <br />duplication of effort. The below chart shows the communities who responded to the survey: <br />City <br />Region <br />Population <br />Area sq. <br />License <br />Yes/ No <br />miles <br />North <br />Duluth <br />East <br />86,277 <br />87.3 <br />No <br />North <br />Grand Rapids <br />East <br />10,862 <br />8.1 <br />, No <br />P.. I H E 1 0 Y <br />NAPubliic Bodics \City Council \Council RCA\ Agenda Pac et \02- 042013 \8,1 Fertilizer Licensing.docs INATUREI <br />