My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INFORMATION 06-04-2012
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2012
>
06-04-2012
>
INFORMATION 06-04-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2012 8:22:31 AM
Creation date
6/1/2012 11:31:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/4/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INFORMATION <br />MEMORANDUM <br />ver <br />TO: Mayor and City Council <br />FROM: Justin Femrite, P.E., City Engineer <br />DATE: June 4, 2012 <br />SUBJECT: MNDOT CIMS Summary <br />On Monday May 21, I attended a Corridor Investment Management Strategy (CIMS) meeting at <br />MNDOT in St. Cloud. This meeting was hosted by MNDOT in an effort to receive local input <br />regarding transportation needs for the next 20 years on the Trunk Highway systems. I have attached <br />some information from MNDOT with some background on their CIMS initiative. Attendees of the <br />meeting included members of various highway coalitions, council members, mayors, county <br />commissioners, city administrators, city and county engineers, and concerned residents. <br />At the meeting, MNDOT discussed how their limited budgets must be focused on preservation and <br />rehabilitation of their existing infrastructure. They further explained the current funding levels are <br />not sufficient for MNDOT to undertake large scale mobility or expansion projects. As such, they <br />have now reallocated the limited amount they have previously budgeted for mobility and expansion <br />to go towards pavement preservation. Mobility enhancement projects axe essentially traffic <br />congestion relief projects. This means projects like the proposed improvements to TH 10 and TH <br />169 through Elk River will have even less funding allocated toward them. This is an approach <br />MNDOT is Eoxced to take at a state wide level due to their current funding levels. <br />On the behalf of Elk River I expressed concern that, as a city, we have recently put up a large <br />amount of local money to study mobility improvements to the trunk highway system on MNDOT's <br />behalf. I further expressed that seeing no movement towards making any type of mobility <br />improvements to TH 10 or TH 169 in Elk River is hard to understand and justify our investment in <br />the planning we completed fox it. I also stated that it is difficult to get community buy-in to the <br />layouts if MNDOT never puts these projects in any of their improvement plans. <br />Sherburne County Commissioner Ewald Peterson and Felix Schmiesing further emphasized the need <br />fox MNDOT to put efforts and funding towards making mobility improvements to TH 10 and TH <br />169 through Elk River. The Sherburne County Public Works Director and County Engineer also <br />expressed similar comments and support for needing these improvements. <br />This was the 6xst round of several meetings I expect MNDOT to host on the CIMS initiative. If you <br />have any questions on the CIMS initiative or want to add formal comments to MNDOT beyond <br />what was communicated at the CIMS meeting, please call me at 763-635-1051. <br />PflMEflEfl IY <br />~Aru~~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.