My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.3. SR 02-11-2013
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2013
>
02-11-2013
>
6.3. SR 02-11-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2013 8:51:53 AM
Creation date
2/8/2013 8:48:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
2/11/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MHFA competition, like the 9% program does, but still must adhere to MHFA scoring <br /> requirements. <br /> Although Section 42 Senior housing projects have not usually been financially feasible, the <br /> economic problems facing the housing industry can actually help in this instance because costs <br /> can be significantly reduced. The developer that originally sold us the lots is willing to discount <br /> them by more than 50%. The subcontractors are able to give us exceptionally good prices <br /> because they need the work and the mortgage interest rates are less than 41, an all-time low. <br /> The project also requires TIF assistance to achieve the targeted rents and is actually required by <br /> MHFA in order to meet scoring requirements for the 4%tax credits. <br /> We have developed 17 one-level Senior projects during the past 20 years including Elk Run <br /> Village in Elk River. Six projects have been Section 42 tax credit projects similar to the one we <br /> are now proposing. <br /> In summary, we are requesting from the City approval of our proposed Dlackhawk Woods <br /> Senior development. We are familiar with the City's standards for building design and products <br /> and will meet those standards. The property is already platted into townhouse lots, which will <br /> accommodate our design, so no further zoning or platting approvals will be necessary. We will <br /> need tax increment financing approval from the City, which will provide the project with <br /> necessary resources to meet the requirements of MHFA. This would be a pay as you go TIF <br /> program so would not require a financial commitment from the City. The existing lot taxes <br /> would continue to be paid and in addition,the City would collect 10% of the increment amount. <br /> Because there will be no children living in the development,there will be no negative impact on <br /> schools or parks. <br /> Thank you for considering our proposal. <br /> Respes fully, <br /> G /;?c, <br /> er <br /> Derrick <br /> g k <br /> Senior 30, LLC <br /> Chief Manager <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.