My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1 BASR 01-08-2013
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Board of Adjustments
>
BOA Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
01-07-2013
>
4.1 BASR 01-08-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2013 1:03:35 PM
Creation date
1/4/2013 1:01:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
BASR
date
1/8/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case File:V 13-01 Cornerstone Sign variance <br /> Page 2 <br /> In 2007, as part of the original construction of the car wash building, two "Car Wash" signs were <br /> installed, each one 4 feet by 36 feet, or 136 square feet. In addition to these signs,which are on facades <br /> adjacent to 171"and Highway 10/ 169, the applicant proposes adding the phrase "Oil Express &". The <br /> proposal in square feet,in table form: <br /> Existing Proposed Total <br /> Highway 10 136 176 312 <br /> 171st 136 36 172 <br /> Total 272 212 484 <br /> The existing 272 sq ft are considered `permitted,non conforming' and are allowed to continue. If the <br /> variance is not approved, the business is still allowed 272 sqft. The additional text brings the signage well <br /> over double the maximum allotted for the `business'. <br /> BACKGROUND/PRECEDENT <br /> In April, 2006, the City Council approved Elk River Fords (nka Cornerstone Auto Resource) expansion <br /> and platting project, which included a consolidation of several parcels, expansion to the existing car <br /> dealership, and construction of a car wash facility. <br /> APPLICABLE REGULATIONS <br /> Variance Criteria <br /> The petitioner has the burden to prove practical difficulties (items 3-5 below). <br /> A variance may be granted by the board only if it finds that: <br /> (1) The variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance. <br /> Staff Response 1. The sign regulation establishes appropriate limits as to number and size <br /> of signage,which are applied equally, to everyone. This balances the business goals with <br /> community goals. This proposal increases by more than doubles the amount of wall <br /> signage allowed. <br /> Staff Response 2. The applicant implies that under the older ordinance, they would be <br /> allowed 300 square feet of signage. True,but the ordinance applied signage to the lineal <br /> frontage of the building. The facade facing Highway 10 would be allowed 242 sqft (2 sqft <br /> per 121 feet of frontage). The sign facing 171"would be allowed a maximum of 176 sqft, <br /> although one or both of these would have been altered to fall under the 300 sqft maximum. <br /> Staff Response 3. The petitioner makes several statements that the signage would not be <br /> visible from Highway 10, 550 feet away. This is not true. In fact,in the evening, the <br /> signage can be easily read from as far away as Highway 101, on the west side of the <br /> Mississippi river. <br /> (2) The variance is consistent with the City of Elk River Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Staff Response 1. The petitioner states that the variances is consistent with the City of Elk <br /> River Comprehensive Plan because the Comprehensive Plan anticipates that Highway <br /> businesses need highway visibility to succeed. This is true,in the sense that businesses <br /> relying on highway traffic are located along highways. A property owner is permitted to put <br /> N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\Variance\V 13-01 Cornerstone Auto\V 13-01 Cornerstone Auto SR to PC 1-8- <br /> 13.docx <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.