My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2. SR 06-10-2002
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2002
>
06/10/2002
>
5.2. SR 06-10-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:31:49 AM
Creation date
6/14/2002 7:51:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/10/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Stephanie Klinzing and <br /> City Council Members <br />Ms. Michele McPherson, Director of Planning <br />June 4, 2002 <br /> Page 2 <br /> <br />D.R. HORTON CONCERNS <br /> <br />It is our opinion that the current Zoning Code Ordinance Section 900.30, very much fulfills the intent by <br />the City to guarantee completion of the required on site improvement items. We would not oppose an <br />increase in the value of the letter of credit requirement or an additional letter of credit guarantee for the <br />completion of the landscape requirements. Typically, all landscaping and other site improvement items <br />are completed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The only time these items are not <br />completed are typically during the winter months. <br /> <br />In our experience, to escrow separate funds with a title company, bank or other financial institution would <br />be a hindrance to the future homeowners, title company processes and closings and financial institution <br />processes. In additional, homeowners will likely see an increase in closing fees and expenses, and <br />undoubtedly get tied up in arcane processes. <br /> <br />D.R. HORTON RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />We suggest that you modify the performance guarantee section of the zoning code to meet the intent by <br />the City and completion of all the required exterior lot improvement items. In addition, the City could <br />require at the time of Building Permit issuance, monies to be escrow with the City, equal to the value of <br />exterior improvements not made (example $2,000 - typical in other metro cities we are developing in). <br />Once the items have been completed the monies are returned back to the developer/builder. By collecting <br />the monies upfront at the time of building permit issuance this would not require the future homeowners <br />to come up with additional funds and wound not affect the title and financial institutions processes as <br />currently recommended by this ordinance amendment. <br /> <br />In reviewing the Statutes of the State Building Code and Municipal Code and speaking to members at the <br />State offices, it is agreed that building code items and lot improvement items are not to be intertwined. <br />Building Code items are for building construction related items and Zoning Code items are for <br />improvements of the land. <br /> <br />We look forward to discussing this in more detail with you on June 10. If you should have any questions, <br />please call me at 952-985-7826 (office) or 952-292-1527 (cell). <br /> <br />Sincerely yours, <br /> <br />D.R. HORTON~INC. --~INNF, SOTA DIVISION <br /> <br />Tom Bakritges [ <br />Project Manager Isa, fid )pment <br /> <br />CC: <br /> <br />Patrick Klaers, City Administrator <br />Neil Hansen, MN Division President <br />Don Patton, Vice President Land Development <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.