My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-17-2003 CC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
11-17-2003 CC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:14 AM
Creation date
11/24/2003 2:33:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
11/17/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council M.h~utes <br />November 17, 2003 <br /> <br />6.1. Request by Ci.ty of Elk River to Review Updated Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Director of Planning Michele McPherson submitted the staff report. Ms. McPherson <br />introduced Rusty Fifield, Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. <br /> <br />Mz. Fifield presented the draft Comprehensive Plan (Plan) to the Council. He thanked the <br />Task Force members and all the boards and commissions for their input on the Plan. He <br />discussed some of the issues that the city should consider in adopting the Plan such as sewer <br />capacity, areas of high density residential, and additional commercial land. <br /> <br />Mayor Klinzing opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Counci_hnember Kuester stated that she received a phone call from Doug Hipsag, a resident <br />who lives north of County Road 33, and he stated his support for the Plan. <br /> <br />Mayor 1,2inzing closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />All the Councilmembers thanked the Task Force and the boards and commissions for all the <br />work, time, and effort they put into the Plan. <br /> <br />Councilmember Tveite stated that he is in support of the Plan. He views the Plan as a <br />preservation of land by allowing the establishment of Greenways. He stated that there is no <br />~vay for the Plan to be perfect and to please everyone. <br /> <br />Councilmember Motto stated the following concerns with the Land Use Plan and Mr. Fifield <br />provided a response to each of the concerns <br /> <br />Concern Response <br /> <br />The area north of County Road 33 should not be <br />opened up to allow 2 t/2 acre lots without any <br />infrastructure to support it. <br />A sewer and water capacity plan should be <br />completed prior to approving the Land Use Plan. <br /> <br />The Commercial districts have been decreased <br />from the 1995 Comprehensive Plan and more <br />areas need to be designated Commercial in the <br />new Plan. <br /> <br />The designated high density areas around the <br />railway station do not have a transportation <br />system to support the increase traffic. <br /> <br />The residential areas near the former Ron's <br />Foods site is still designated residential even <br />though it is sandwiched between Commercial <br />and Industrial zoned property. <br /> <br />The area is al.ready open for higher <br />density development (cluster <br />developments). The city should <br />determine if the area is going to remain <br />unsewered in its ultimate form. <br /> <br />Agree that a sewer and water capacity <br />Dian eventually needs to be completed. <br />Agree that more Commercial districts <br />are needed. City needs to review the <br />sewer capacity before establishing any <br />more Commercial districts. Areas that <br />could be considered are the Highway <br />169 corridor and east Highway 10. East <br />Highway 10 area is not market driven at <br />this time. <br /> <br />High density residential put near railway <br />due to mass transit system in area and to <br />be near the Business Park (future <br />employment base). <br /> <br />Not addressed. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.