My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5. HRSR 11-05-2012
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
HRA Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
11-05-2012
>
5. HRSR 11-05-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2012 10:05:31 AM
Creation date
11/1/2012 4:36:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
HRSR
date
11/5/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Public Comments <br /> Making our neighborhood into a"historic"neighborhood. I own my <br /> The following were the written comments received during the home and property and would refuse to request permission from a <br /> public comment period ending October 22nd committee to change my own home. I purposefully do not live in an <br /> "association". Resident <br /> Mixed use areas—be careful of not too much residential because still <br /> What is the best aspect of this plan? close to tracks—doesn't attract upper end residential. Business operator <br /> Great for moving traffic through town;terrible for the downtown Bike trail from downtown to the train station. We have a unique <br /> businesses—have you no concern for them? Business owner opportunity to have a 3—4 mile loop heading north from the station <br /> and looping back to the downtown. With parking an issue and more <br /> Nothing on our behalf. Resident people living downtown,this also encourages pedal power to reduce <br /> traffic. Planning Commissioner <br /> Turning Bailey Point into a nature park. Resident <br /> Turning the Babcock's `Bailey Point"property to a nature park. General Comments— <br /> Resident <br /> With reduction of immediate access,traffic decreases,giving reduction <br /> Redevelopment of obsolete buildings. Business operator of retail value in terms of sales and rents available to owners thereby <br /> reducing value of area. Business owner <br /> This destroys property value—corner home with wall surround. Truly <br /> What should the Task Force reconsider? upset—by out some homes. Resident <br /> Downtown access,very limited,inhibiting growth. Retailers need Thanks for emailing postcards to keep people informed. On page 10, <br /> visibility and immediate access, this plan eliminates immediate access. #2,Mississippi River should say Elk River. Resident <br /> Business owner <br /> We will never go along with this plan and will paint our house with a <br /> I strongly urge the Task Force to explain their vision of"historic bright polka dot design if necessary. Resident <br /> downtown"to include the 100+ year old buildings in the"mixed use" <br /> area north of Highway 10 between Jackson and Main Street. This area I will never go along with this nor pay any fines. I will do everything <br /> should be part of the"core"area. Business owner in my power to speak against this and act against this in any and every <br /> avenue! Also,most homes in the neighborhood are not very historic to <br /> Value of all property near road expansion/ramps. Great walls begin with. Resident <br /> surround my property;wow—great! Resident <br /> Git'ex done—it would invigorate all of Elk River! Business operator <br /> Making our neighborhood a"historic neighborhood." Resident <br /> Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part IV, page 9 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.