Laserfiche WebLink
intention behind this section is to outline projects that can be completed early,generating political <br /> momentum,which will help more resource intensive projects as they become prudent. <br /> Part IV:Appendix. This section includes the SWOT analysis, the sketches associated with the <br /> 2006 planning process, the received written public comments, and a place holder for the resolution <br /> approving the plan. <br /> Key changes from earlier draft. Following the public comment period, some changes were made,in <br /> response the comments received. These changes include: <br /> • Adding the historic context study to the relevant studies in Part I. This background information <br /> is important to the users of the document as they take on the strategies suggested. <br /> • A number of people commented on the size of the downtown, and their belief that the <br /> downtown area must grow in size to accommodate this activities sought. The Task Force agreed, <br /> increasing and reintroducing the core downtown development patterns to a 2 block area north of <br /> Highway 10. <br /> Comments not incorporated. The Task Force received a number of comments from interested parties <br /> that did not compel a change to the plan. Among them: <br /> • The plan maintains a goal to establish an historic preservation district, although the Task Force <br /> received some strongly worded comments from impacted residents noting their displeasure with <br /> this idea. The reference remains to allow the Historic Preservation Commission to further <br /> explore the issue with the neighborhood as a whole. If the neighborhood does not wish for an <br /> historic preservation district after information has been presented,it is understood that the <br /> Historic Preservation and City Council will not continue. <br /> • The plan does not show all of the impacts to area properties brought by Highway 10 <br /> construction. While the plan removes the buildings that will be lost to construct, the plan does <br /> not illustrate other impacts adequately,in the view of those commenting. Unfortunately, these <br /> impacts are not adequately known to develop meaningful responses. As more information is <br /> learned, modifications to the plan are expected. <br /> FINANCIAL IMPACT <br /> None <br /> ATTACHMENTS <br /> • Draft Mississippi Connections plan,prepared by the Downtown Task Force <br /> Action Motion by Second by Vote <br /> Follow Up <br /> C:\Users\dhuebner\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\X3O71NQV\SR <br /> to HRA Mississippi Connections Downtown Plan 11-5-12.docx pg.2 <br />