My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INFORMATION #1 11-05-2012
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
HRA Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
11-05-2012
>
INFORMATION #1 11-05-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2012 1:10:02 PM
Creation date
11/1/2012 1:09:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
HRSR
date
11/5/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Finance & Commerce http://finance-commerce.com <br /> The great property tax free-for-all <br /> by Chris Newmarker <br /> Published: October 24th, 2012 <br /> When it came to taxpayer-funded breaks, Minneapolis- <br /> based discount retailer Target Corp. got a two-for-one <br /> special in the Twin Cities last year. :- <br /> Brooklyn Park officials gave Target $2.5 million for its <br /> northern office campus expansion just months after <br /> Inver Grove Heights gave $1.25 million for a Target If <br /> store delayed by concerns about consumer demand. <br /> The money came out of 2010 state legislation <br /> Y 9� <br /> permitting local governments to direct excess property <br /> tax dollars from tax increment financing districts to <br /> private developments. The idea was to kick-start hiring <br /> in a Minnesota construction industry that lost 50,000 <br /> jobs in the Great Recession. 58%of projects I i not <br /> From Target's plans at opposite ends of the Twin Cities track co6 construction <br /> to a Pizza Ranch in Elk River and a rehab of an aircraft <br /> maintenance facility in Duluth, 35 cities and other <br /> public entities across the state funneled $35.9 million to 76 building projects before the July 1 <br /> deadline for construction starts, according to a Finance & Commerce investigation. <br /> I That"temporary authority to stimulate construction," some claim, helped to leverage $510.6 <br /> million-worth of construction projects. <br /> As for construction jobs, numbers were unavailable for 44 out of 76 projects.Some cities did <br /> not keep track of the jobs at all, while others had incomplete or unverified counts, Finance & <br /> Commerce found. <br /> Why? The state legislation did not require them to count, complete or verify. <br /> The lack of oversight is troubling even to state Sen. James Metzen, DFL-South St. Paul, who <br /> helped to author the 2010 bill. Metzen says it is "common sense" that job creation was the <br /> goal and that tracking it holds communities accountable. <br /> "The cities should be counting. And if <br /> they're not, we ought to say to them, <br /> 'What did you do with the money? And <br /> how many construction jobs and =� <br /> permanent jobs were created?'... If they're <br /> not disclosing, maybe it has to be a <br /> requirement going forward: 'Tell us what ate' <br /> you're doing,'" Metzen said. ., <br /> Finance &Commerce found that the <br /> legislation appears to have created 2,199 , ` - <br /> construction jobs in 14 cities and is <br /> creating or retaining at least 7,681 <br /> permanent jobs in 24. Inver Grove Heights indirectly gave Target Corp. <br /> Even a number such as 7,681 permanent delayed by million for aboutconsumer demand. <br /> jobs is misleading. Less than a third are (Staff photos: Bill Klotz) <br /> jobs that employers are creating. Of the <br /> 5,412 retained, nearly three-fourths come <br /> from Target, which plans to move 3,900 jobs from downtown Minneapolis to Brooklyn Park. <br /> For the cities keeping track of jobs, each construction job cost an average of$8,213.53 in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.