Laserfiche WebLink
Economic Development Authority Minutes <br />September 8, 2003 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Strategic Industrial Marketing Activities Update <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />in <br />to the lis' <br /> <br /> Development Assistant Heidi Hall Ms. Hall reviewed the Product <br />Competitive, Key Account/Leact Oene~-atlon, 13romot~ons ex: Advertising, <br /> Strategic Partnership, and Business Retention Strategies as outlined <br /> the EDA dated September 8, 2003. Ms. Hall provided two corrections <br /> available industrial lease space. <br /> <br />School. Ms. <br />Energy City, <br />"sustainable" bull <br />renewable <br />through Energy City <br />Hall. <br /> <br />asked how the City became involved in promoting the Rogers <br /> explained that the new school is being promoted through <br />of the fact that it is considered a "high performance" or <br /> and incorporates energy efficient capabilities with a <br /> Ms. Hall noted that there are other projects promoted <br /> ? Farm, and the Livonia Township <br /> <br />Ms. Mehelich noted that staff <br />schedule a tour of Cymbet <br />with keynote speak Mark Sheffert. <br />Manufacturers & Technology Week <br /> <br /> with the Chamber of Commerce to <br /> which will be followed by a luncheon <br />event is being planned in recognition of <br /> 20-24). <br /> <br />6. Industrial Land Development Strate~ <br /> <br />Director of Economic Development Cath <br />Ehlers & Assodates. Mr. Inman discussed <br />industrial/business park development costs <br />dated September 8, 2003. Mr. Inman stated that if 1 <br />his recommendations, that they then should meet <br />the process of evaluating their cost of the land and <br />that the EDA should determine if they prefer having <br />RFP (Request for Proposals) would be appropriate. Mr. <br />strategies that may be required in negotiations, such as <br /> <br /> introduced Sid Inrnan of <br />outlined in the analysis of the <br />.'d to the EDA in the staff report <br /> EDA was comfortable with <br /> two landowners to begin <br /> the process. He stated <br /> developer and if so, an <br /> explained various <br /> <br />.M.s. Mehelich noted that option would be left open to negotiate a "~ cost when in <br />direct competition with another city. X <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER DWYER MOVED TO CONTINUE DISCUSSIONS <br />WITH THE TWO LANDOWNERS WITHIN THE PARAME~RS <br />SET FORTH IN THE EHLERS & ASSOCIATES PROPOSAL.~K <br />COMMISSIONER KOENIG SECONDED THE MOTION. THENx <br />MOTION CARRIED 6-0. ~ <br /> <br />Case No. CU 03-27, Request for an Interim Use Permit for a Fitness Faciliw, Elk <br />River Business Park <br /> <br /> <br />