Laserfiche WebLink
i REQUEST FOR ACTION <br /> River <br /> TO ITEM NUMBER <br /> Mayor and City Council 7.3 <br /> AGENDA SECTION MEETING DATE PREPARED BY <br /> Public Hearings October 15, 2012 Jeremy Barnhart,Planning Manager <br /> ITEM DESCRIPTION REVIEWED By <br /> Conditional Use Permit:Affiance Machine/Bryan Provo for Cal Portner, City Administrator <br /> Outdoor Storage in the Business Park Zoning District, Case No. REVIEWED BY <br /> CU 12-17 <br /> ACTION REQUESTED <br /> Staff and the Planning Commission recommend denial of the Conditional Use Permit on the grounds <br /> that the application is inconsistent with the requirements of outdoor storage in the Business Park. <br /> The Council has a number of options: <br /> 1. The Council could accept modifications to the outdoor storage proposal made by the applicant to <br /> conform to the requirements established by Ordinance. <br /> 2. The Council could return any modifications made by the applicant to the Planning Commission <br /> for review and recommendation. <br /> 3. The Council could deny the application by directing staff to prepare a Findings of Fact for denial <br /> for adoption at the November 19,2012, City Council meeting. <br /> It is likely that the applicant will modify his proposal. <br /> BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION <br /> The development of an ordinance allowing outdoor storage is progressing though the review process <br /> (OA 12-04). The applicant was not at the Planning Commission meeting to agree to the <br /> recommendations made by the Commission; staff and the Commission felt it more appropriate to <br /> recommend denial due to the gap between what is proposed for outdoor storage and what the <br /> Commission recommends as ordinance language. <br /> Proposal <br /> The applicant proposed a 30 foot x 30 foot area enclosed by an 8 foot high black steel chain link fence. <br /> Screening is proposed with vinyl slats inserted through the fence. The area would be located adjacent to <br /> the accessory structure on the property and would house a trailer. <br /> Planning Commission comments <br /> The Planning Commission agreed with staff's recommendation that due to the inconsistencies with the <br /> proposed ordinance,the application should be denied. <br /> Public Hearing comments <br /> No comments have been received for or against this proposal. There have been three public hearings. <br /> POWERED BY <br /> N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\CUP\CU 12-17 Alliance\SR to CC CU 12-17 Alliance NATURE <br /> OS 10-15-12.docx <br />