My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8.1. SR 09-17-2012
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2012
>
09-17-2012
>
8.1. SR 09-17-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2012 10:20:34 AM
Creation date
9/14/2012 9:39:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
9/17/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Patrick B. Steinhoff <br /> From: Matthew A. Anderson <br /> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 12:19 PM <br /> To: Patrick B. Steinhoff <br /> Cc: Mark Leadens; mark leadens <br /> Subject: StarTribune article, picked up from Washington Post <br /> StarTiribune <br /> Science project is taken to the cleaners <br /> • Article by: LENA H. SUN <br /> • Washington Post <br /> • September 3, 2011 -6:29 PM <br /> WASHINGTON - Like many memorable science fair projects, it began with a simple idea: Find out what chemicals remain in dry- <br /> cleaned clothing. <br /> But the problem facing Alexa Dantzler, 15,was that she didn't have access to the proper equipment. <br /> So, the sophomore at Bishop O'Connell High School in Arlington, Va., went online. She e-mailed three or four chemistry <br /> professors across the country asking for help. Only Paul Roepe, then chairman of Georgetown University's chemistry <br /> department, seemed intrigued. He took on the research "for fun." <br /> But what started out as something so simple prompted a chain reaction in the university lab: an e-mail exchange, an invitation to <br /> collaborate and, last week, a paper published online in a peer-reviewed environmental journal. The paper gives new details <br /> about the amount of a toxic chemical that lingers in wool, cotton and polyester clothing after it is dry-cleaned. <br /> "At the end of the day, nobody, I mean nobody, has previously done this simple thing--gone out there to several different dry <br /> cleaners and tested different types of cloth"to see how much of the chemical persists, said Roepe, who supervised the study. <br /> Dantzler, with help from her mother, sewed squares of wool, cotton, polyester and silk into the lining of seven identical men's <br /> jackets, then took them to be cleaned from one to six times at seven Northern Virginia cleaners, which had no prior knowledge <br /> of the experiment. <br /> She kept the patches in plastic bags in the freezer and went to Georgetown once or twice a week to do the chemical analysis <br /> with two grad students. <br /> The research team found that perch loroethylene, a dry cleaning solvent that has been linked to cancer and neurological <br /> damage, stayed in the fabrics and that levels increased with repeat cleaning, particularly in wool. The study was published <br /> online Tuesday in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. <br /> Between 65 percent and 70 percent of the country's estimated 25,000 dry cleaning facilities use the solvent, known as PCE or <br /> perc, industry representatives said. <br /> Government regulations and voluntary industry guidelines exist for atmospheric concentrations in the workplace, and there has <br /> been a long-running fight between environmentalists and the federal government over how quickly the chemical should be <br /> phased out for dry cleaners. <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.