My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2.5. ERMUSR 09-11-2012
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2012
>
09-11-2012
>
2.5. ERMUSR 09-11-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2012 4:15:04 PM
Creation date
9/10/2012 4:15:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
9/11/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Docket No. TS11-2-000, et al. - 8 - <br /> contends that its facilities qualify for a waiver because they are limited and discrete <br /> 69 kV substation equipment, such as breakers, switches, and transformers, located in <br /> individual substations in the Elk River area. Elk River adds that its transmission facilities <br /> have been subject to the functional operation and control of the Midwest Independent <br /> Transmission System Operator, to which all potential requests for transmission are <br /> directed. In the alternative, Elk River contends that it qualifies for a waiver because of its <br /> small size, as its facilities are minimal and its total sales for each of the past three years <br /> ranged from 220,000 to 250,000 MWhs, well below the Commission's criteria of <br /> 4,000,000 MWhs for a small utility.25 Elk Hills also argues that imposing a separation of <br /> functions barrier would be an undue burden because of its limited staff, e.g., one <br /> employee for both transmission and sales duties 26 <br /> Discussion <br /> 18. Based on the representations in its filing, we find that Elk River's transmission <br /> facilities qualify as limited and discrete, rather than as an integrated grid, and Elk River <br /> also meets the criteria for a small utility. Accordingly, we will grant Elk River's request <br /> for waiver of the requirements to comply with our Standards of Conduct and to maintain <br /> and establish an OASIS as they apply to municipal electric systems through the <br /> reciprocity requirements of the Commission's pro forma OATT. <br /> 19. The waiver of the requirement to establish an OASIS and the waiver of Standards <br /> of Conduct requirements will remain in effect absent subsequent action by the <br /> Commission as, for example, in response to a complaint that an entity evaluating its <br /> transmission needs could not get the information necessary to complete its evaluation 27 <br /> 25 See Wolverine Power Supply Coop., Inc., 127 FERC 1161,159, at P 15 (2009) <br /> (reaffirming that only utilities disposing of under 4,000,000 MWh of energy annually <br /> meet the Commissions definition of small utility). See also Black Hills, 135 FERC <br /> ¶ 61,058 at PP 4-7. <br /> 26 Id. at 2. <br /> 27 Elk River must notify the Commission if there is a material change in facts that <br /> affect the waiver within 30 days of the date of such change. Material Changes Order, <br /> 127 FERC ¶61,141 atP5. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.