Laserfiche WebLink
- 6 - <br /> River could become subject to the standards of conduct under standards of reciprocity.6 <br /> Having recently entered into agreements turning over functional operational control of its <br /> transmission equipment to the Midwest ISO, as a practical matter,transmission requests <br /> to use Elk River's facilities would come to the Midwest ISO and not to Elk River. Elk <br /> River thus has no power to grant or deny transmission use and cannot profit in trading <br /> transmission information. <br /> As the Commission has recognized, the costs of complying with certain <br /> reciprocity-based obligations—specifically, the requirements to create or participate in an <br /> OASIS and to separate transmission-function employees from marketing-function <br /> employees—can be unduly onerous for small utilities.? Such a burden on small utilities <br /> could harm competition rather than enhance it. Elk River is a"small utility"under the <br /> definition adopted by the Commission,8 although Elk River recognizes that as a <br /> participant in the Midwest ISO, the small utility standard for waiver may not apply.9 <br /> The Commission has furthermore recognized that the burden of imposing <br /> standards of conduct requirements on utilities that own only limited and discrete <br /> 6 Commission policy,which Elk River supports,requires an open access transmission customer to stand <br /> ready to provide reciprocal transmission service, if requested,to any public utility from which it takes open <br /> access transmission service. Consequently,Elk River would be obliged to provide and would provide, if <br /> requested,reciprocity-based transmission service to another public utility from which Elk River takes open <br /> access transmission service. The Commission has stated that"absent a waiver,the obligation to provide <br /> reciprocal,non-discriminatory services necessarily commits the customer of open access service,even if <br /> not a public utility,to abide by the OASIS and standards of conduct requirements."Order No. 889-A,62 <br /> Fed Reg. 12,484,at 12,488,FERC Stets.&Regs.If 31,049,at 30,553. To date,the transmission uses of <br /> Elk River's 69 kV substation transmission equipment have been to enable Great River Energy to deliver <br /> power to Elk River and for Elk River to deliver power on behalf of a wind plant located in the City. Elk <br /> River has never denied or had controversy over its providing transmission service. Of course,any <br /> transmission request would automatically be granted within Midwest ISO Order No. 888 tariff <br /> requirements through MISO. <br /> See, e.g.,N. States Power Co., 76 FERC¶61,250,at 62,297(1996)(fording that separating merchant and <br /> transmission functions pursuant to Order No. 889 can impose undue financial burden on small utilities). <br /> 8 See supra note 4 at 4. <br />