Laserfiche WebLink
The proposed lot split does not meet finding 2,as the proposed lot split is not consistent with all <br /> applicable general and specialized city,county, and regional plans,in particular the 2010 Focused Area <br /> Study Plan. The Focused Area Study Plan identifies the need for a connection of the drive serving the <br /> businesses on the west side of Highway 10 to the public street to the north. This proposed lot split <br /> would make this connection unlikely, to the detriment of the businesses in the area that rely on vehicular <br /> access. <br /> The proposed lot split does not meet finding 3 because it creates a lot that provides less than 3,000 <br /> square feet of buildable land,well under the minimum size for C-3 zoning lots,and well below the <br /> minimum buildable area for the type and density of development and uses contemplated in the C-3 <br /> zoning district. <br /> The proposed lot split does not meet finding 7 because it would have an adverse impact on the adjacent <br /> parcels by making the connection of roads unlikely,therefore hampering the development and use of the <br /> lots on the west side of Highway 10. <br /> Lastly, the lot configuration also appears to be inconsistent with Section 30-477 of the City Code,which <br /> requires that lot remnants be attached to adjacent lots rather than allowed to remain as unusable parcels. <br /> Lot remnants are lots that house storm water features and offer no buildable site. Historically,the city <br /> has required these to be attached to a buildable lot,to avoid a situation where the property owner neglects <br /> the parcel requiring the city to acquire the property in a tax forfeiture situation to preserve the storm <br /> water features. <br /> Park dedication. The comment letter mentions a park dedication requirement. Park dedication is not <br /> required per section 30-327 (d) of the City Code. <br /> FINANCIAL IMPACT <br /> None <br /> ATTACHMENTS <br /> • Location Map <br /> • Applicants Narrative <br /> • Staff Comment Letter Dated May 21,2012 <br /> • City Code Section 30-375,Required Findings for Subdivision Approval <br /> • Subdivision Proposal <br /> Action Motion by Second by Vote <br /> Follow Up <br />