Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Minutes Page 3 <br /> July 16,2012 <br /> TO APPROVE PAYMENT IN LIEU OF FEES AGREEMENT IN THE <br /> • AMOUNT OF $194,276.MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> 7.2 Conditional Use Permit to Amend Barrington Square Planned Unit Development to Allow <br /> Physical Recreation and Training Uses,Case No. CU 12-13 <br /> 7.3 Conditional Use Permit to Allow Physical Recreation and Training Use (Dance Studio—PS <br /> Dance), Case No. CU 12-14 <br /> Mr.Leeseberg presented the staff report. <br /> Mayor Dietz opened the public hearing for both of these items. <br /> Pam Sitts, 16045 72nd Street Otsego—Stated she was available for questions. <br /> Mayor Dietz closed the public hearing. <br /> MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOTIN AND SECONDED BY <br /> COUNCILMEMBER GUMPHREY TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE <br /> PERMIT, CASE NO. CU 12-13 TO PAMELA SITTS/P. HEINUM FOR AN <br /> AMENDMENT TO THE BARRINGTON SQUARE PLANNED UNIT <br /> DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW PHYSICAL RECREATION AND TRAINING <br /> USES. MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER WESTGAARD AND SECONDED BY <br /> COUNCILMEMBER ZERWAS TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, <br /> CASE NO. CU 12-14 FOR A DANCE STUDIO WITH THE FOLLOWING <br /> • CONDITIONS: <br /> 1. AS A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT,THE <br /> APPLICANT SHALL APPLY FOR ALL REQUIRED PERMITS. <br /> 2. SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE AS OUTLINED IN THE <br /> BARRINGTON SQUARE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT <br /> AGREEMENT. <br /> 3. ALL EXTERIOR SIGNAGE SHALL REQUIRE A PERMIT. <br /> MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> 7.4 Patrick Kasper Lot Split, Case No.LS 12-01 <br /> Mr.Barnhart presented the staff report outlining the findings in staff's recommendation for <br /> denial of the request. <br /> Mayor Dietz opened the public hearing. <br /> Patrick Kasper, 16888 Highway 10—Stated he meets the ordinance requirements for a <br /> billboard. He stated the Focus Area Study does not detail where the road alignment will be <br /> in the future and there is no chance of the pond being filled in because it is on a drainage <br /> easement.He stated the buildable square feet would be 5-6,000 square feet and not the 3,000 <br /> identified by staff. He stated the land is currently not at its best and highest use and his <br /> request will be an income and tax producing parcel designed to promote local businesses. He <br /> • stated he disagreed with the condition that the fencing be removed from the property as it is <br /> needed for security for the mini-storage business. <br />