06-18-2012 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City Council Minutes Page 7 June 18, 2012 ----------------------------- findings of fact as to why this use would not be appropriate in the Planned Unit isDevelopment. He noted a 60 day extension letter will also need to be sent to the applicant. MOVED BY COUNCILEMBER ZERWAS AND SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOTIN TO CONTINUE ITEMS 7.3 AND 7.4 TO JULY 16, 2012, FOR STAFF TO PREPARE A RESOLUTION OF DENIAL OUTLINING THE FINDINGS OF FACT FOR THE DENIAL, AND TO SEND THE APPLICANT A 60 DAY EXTENSION LETTER. MOTION TIED 2 -2. Councilmember Motin noted that if this item isn't tabled, a motion would need to be made as to whether to approve the conditional use permit to amend the planned unit development, which if it fails means the request is denied so it would be better to continue the item until all the Council was present. MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOTIN AND SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ZERWAS TO CONTINUE TO CONTINUE ITEMS 7.3 AND 7.4 TO JULY 16, 2012, FOR STAFF TO PREPARE A RESOLUTION OF DENIAL OUTLINING THE FINDINGS OF FACT FOR THE DENIAL, AND TO SEND THE APPLICANT A 60 DAY EXTENSION LETTER. MOTION CARRIED 4 -0. 7.5 Request by AutoZone for Site Plan Approval to Allow Auto Parts Store. Lot 1. Block 1. Elk River Crossing 3,d (West of Zane Street and South of Existing Gas Station/ Convenience Store), Case No. SP 12 -02 • Mr. Barnhart presented the staff report. Mayor Dietz opened the public hearing. There being no one to speak to this issue, Mayor Dietz closed the public hearing. Councilmember Motin questioned if there were any covenants for the development regarding exclusivity as there is already an auto parts store located next to this lot. Staff stated no information was found regarding exclusivity. MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOTIN AND SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ZERWAS TO APPROVE SITE PLAN, CASE NO. SP 12 -02, AS ILLUSTRATED ON DRAWINGS DATED RECEIVED JUNE 4, 2012, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. ALL ITEMS OF THE STAFF COMMENT LETTER DATED MAY 18, 2012 SHALL BE ADDRESSED. 2. AS SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT, THE APPLICANT SHALL APPLY FOR ALL REQUIRE PERMITS. 3. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN NEEDS TO BE SIGNED BY A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND INCLUDE AT LEAST 16 OVER STORY, 8 EVERGREEN, AND 8 ORNAMENTAL TREES. 4. THE LIGHTING PLAN NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED TO MAINTAIN AN AVERAGE OF 3 FOOTCANDLES. 5. THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE WILL NEED TO BE MODIFIED TO • MEET THE PUD REQUIREMENTS.